
近今地理学史研究在中国的主要进展
Major progress of recent research on the history of geography in China
鉴于近今地理学史研究在中国的进展除部分领域外尚无系统总结,论文基于文献梳理,参考科学史研究思潮的演变,讨论了其主要进展及未来值得关注的主要问题。梳理表明:① 地理学史是中国地理学中一门具有标识度的学术领域,研究成果丰硕、领域覆盖面广、研究群体稳定;② 领域体系初步建构,形成了学科史、思想史、社会史、编史研究的研究体系,基本与科学史研究领域相对应;③ 地理学史研究思潮多样,基本与当代科学史主要思潮相切合,但对知识社会史、语境论、概念史、阅读史等科学史思潮的借鉴不够,新近地理学思潮下的研究成果较少;④ 研究对象的空间范围、分支领域、主体差异明显,主要体现为聚焦中国地理学史研究,在中国地图学史与近现代历史地理学史,中国近现代著名地理学研究机构、社团、学者方面成果丰硕,与之相应的其他空间范围、分支领域、主体的研究则有所弱化;⑤ 中国地理学史专门的研究集中在古代阶段,近代阶段逐渐兴起,现当代研究主要是进展回顾、综述文献。未来值得关注的主要问题包括:① 关注研究的薄弱对象,更为全面地展现中国地理学发展脉络,特别是近百年学科史;② 强化科学史中知识社会史、语境论、概念史、阅读史等思潮的借鉴,关注现当代地理学思潮下的地理学史研究;③ 留意现当代中国地理学史的社会价值阐释,拓展地理学的社会认知;④ 注重与国外地理学史研究的对话,提升中国学者地理学史研究的国际话语。
In view of the fact that there is no systematic summary of recent studies on the history of geography in China except in some selected fields, based on a literature review and the change of thoughts in research on the history of science, this study examined the major progress of recent research on the history of geography and related works in China, and discussed the issues that deserve further attention in the future. The literature review found that: 1) The history of geography is an independent academic field in Chinese geography, characterized by fruitful research results, wide field coverage, and stable research groups. 2) The system of the field has been tentatively constructed, forming a research system that covers disciplinary history, intellectual history, social history, and research on compiling history, which largely corresponds to the research field of the history of science. 3) There are many thoughts in the study of the history of geography, which largely aligns with the main trends of contemporary history of science. However, due to insufficient reference to the new trends in the history of science such as the social history of knowledge, contextualism, conceptual history, and reading history, there are only few research achievements under the recent trends of geographical thoughts. 4) The spatial scope, subfields, and subjects of the research objects are different, mainly reflected in the focus on the study of the history of Chinese geography, and studies on the history of cartography and modern historical geography in China, famous geographical research institutions, societies, and scholars in contemporary China have made fruitful achievements. In contrast, the corresponding research on other spatial scopes, sub-areas, and subjects is weaker. 5) Specialized research on the history of Chinese geography has focused on the ancient period, with a gradual emergence of the modern period, and modern and contemporary research is mainly a review of progress and a synthesis of the literature. The main issues worthy of attention in future research include: 1) Focusing on weak areas of research, and presenting a more comprehensive development trajectory of Chinese geography, especially the disciplinary history in the last hundred years. 2) Strengthening the reference to the trends of the social history of knowledge, contextualism, conceptual history, and reading history, and paying more attention to research on the history of geography under modern and contemporary geographical thoughts. 3) Paying attention to the interpretation of the social value of the history of modern and contemporary Chinese geography and expanding the societal cognition of geography. 4) Emphasizing dialogue with international research and enhancing the international discourse of research on the history of Chinese geography.
地理学史研究 / 领域体系 / 多样化思潮 / 不平衡性 / 未来研究方向 / 中国 {{custom_keyword}} /
research on the history of geography / domain system / diversified ideological trends / imbalance / future research directions / China {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
陈学熙. 中国地理学家派[J]. 地学杂志, 1911, 2(17): 3-11.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
唐锡仁, 郑锡煌. 中国地理学史研究三十年(1949—1979)[J]. 自然科学史研究, 1982, 1(1): 55-62.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
刘盛佳. 中国地理学思想史研究: 20世纪的回顾概述[M]// 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院. 刘盛佳学术与人生. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 2012: 99-107.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
唐晓峰. “反向格义”与中国地理学史研究[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), 2009, 46(2): 81-91, 144.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
孙俊, 潘玉君, 汤茂林. 中国地理学史研究的理路分析: 兼论中国地理学传统的流变[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(3): 589-600.
中国地理学史研究历程的考察表明其具有一定阶段性——从科学史研究到思想史研究:①20世纪40-80年代主要是科学史研究,建构了中国古代地理学的知识体系和学科体系,经历了梳理知识体系、建构学科体系和彻底重构学科体系三个阶段;②80年代后的思想史研究阶段是对科学史研究的深化,一方面建构了地理学科学方面的思想体系和“元问题”系统研究,另一方面对中国古代人文地理学思想给予了重新建构和评估。由此同时尝试回答中国地理学传统的流变,大致历程是:①公元前具有关注人文世界和注重考察、研究自然的传统;②公元前后到19世纪中叶这段时间以关注人文世界为主,考察和研究自然的传统有所弱化;③19世纪中叶以来中国地理学传统与欧美地理学传统有深厚渊源关系。同时也说明了中国古代有地理学,其传统与欧美地理学既有共通之处,又有所差别。
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
王鹏玮. 近二十年来晚清民国地理学史研究的回顾与展望[J]. 中国科技史杂志, 2021, 42(4): 619-629.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
曹婉如. 近四十年来中国地图学史研究的回顾[J]. 自然科学史研究, 1990, 9(3): 283-289.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
姜道章. 近九十年来中国地图学史的研究[J]. 华冈地理学报, 1995, 23(12): 169-201.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
成一农. 近70年来中国古地图与地图学史研究的主要进展[J]. 中国历史地理论丛, 2019, 34(3): 18-34.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
潘晟. 西方地图史研究: 收藏兴趣、后现代转向、多样化[J]. 中国历史地理论丛, 2019, 34(1): 139-158.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
约翰·舒斯特. 科学史与科学哲学导论[M]. 安维复, 译. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2013: 475-479.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
魏屹东. 科学思想史: 一种基于语境论编史学的探讨[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015: 9-11.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
刘兵. 克丽奥眼中的科学: 科学编史学初论[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社, 1996: 6.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
孙俊. 知识地理学: 空间与地方间的叙事转型与重构[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 97.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
普雷斯顿·詹姆斯. 地理学思想史[M]. 李旭旦, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982: 3.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
罗纳德·约翰斯顿. 地理学与地理学家: 1945年以来的英美人文地理学[M]. 唐晓峰, 李平, 叶冰, 等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2010: 5.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
张剑. 中国近代科学与科学体制化[M]. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2008: 11-14.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
邹振环. 晚清西方地理学在中国: 以1815至1911年西方地理学译著的传播与影响为中心[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2000: 310.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
邹振环. 世界想象: 西学东渐与明清汉文地理文献[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2022: 3, 14-20.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
杨吾扬. 地理学思想史纲要[M]. 开封: 河南大学地理系, 1984: 1-6.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
刘盛佳. 地理学思想史[M]. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 1990: 37.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
施雅轩. 地理思想·思想地理[M]. 高雄: 丽文文化, 2012: 1-5.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
保罗·克拉瓦尔. 地理学思想史[M]. 郑胜华, 刘德美, 刘清华, 等译. 4版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015: 3.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
唐晓峰. 从混沌到秩序: 中国上古地理思想史述论[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2010: 9, 287.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[26] |
郭双林. 西潮激荡下的晚清地理学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2000.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[27] |
蔡运龙,
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[28] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[29] |
汤茂林, 刘凯, 孙俊. 罗纳德·约翰斯顿的学术思想与贡献[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43(3): 603-615.
罗纳德·约翰斯顿是一位享誉世界的人文地理学家和人文地理学史家。在硕果累累的一生中,他对人文地理学科作出了特别的贡献,表现于城市地理学、政治地理学、政治学等学科领域的理论和经验研究,地理学思想史和计量方法方面的开创性研究,出版地理学经典《地理学与地理学家》《选举地理》《人文地理学辞典》等重要著作、教材40余部。此外,约翰斯顿注重培育健康的学术文化,发表了大量书评,长期担任著名学科期刊编辑。
[
Ron Johnston is a world-renowned human geographer and historian of geographic thought. In his fruitful life, he made unparalleled contribution to the discipline of human geography. His contribution is not only reflected in his empirical research in urban geography, political geography, and political science with many academic journal papers, but also in his pioneering research on the history of geographical thought and quantitative research methods, and classic works such as Geography and Geographers. He published more than 40 academic monographs, including Philosophy and Human Geography, On Human Geography, and Putting Votes into Their Place: Geography and Elections in Great Britain, edited or coedited more than 40 academic monographs, including A Dictionary of Human Geography, The Future of Geography, and A Century of British Geography. As a university faculty, teaching is one of the three academic works. Johnston acted as course instructor for undergraduate courses such as Urban Geography, Urbanization, Internal Structure of the City, Philosophy and Methodology of Human Geography, Political Geography, State and Economic Restructuring, Contemporary Economic and Political Issues, Geography of Election, Research Methods, Multivariate Statistical Analysis, The State and the Environment, An Introduction to Geography, and for graduate courses, including Urban Geography, Urban Internal Structure, and Multivariate Statistics/Computing. As an advisor, Johnston supervised 47 graduate students. He wrote several important textbooks, including Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Geography: A Primer on the General Linear Model and Geography of Elections. He also set us a good example in terms of academic service. He coedited both Progress in Human Geography and Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space for 25 years (1979-2004), and served on countless editorial boards. He also often served as an external reviewer, participating in the evaluation of dissertations, research fund proposals, professional training programs, book manuscripts, RAE (research assessment exercise), REF (research excellence framework), professional title promotion, and so on. He published many book reviews to build healthy academic community culture. Ron Johnston's diligence, persistence, kindness, and warm and academic service spirit will always inspire us to move forward. We, as Chinese counterparts, can learn a lot from Ron Johnston as a professor and a member of the academic community. {{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[30] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[31] |
胡焕庸. 创设地理研究所之需要与计划[J]. 科学, 1936, 20(10): 870.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[32] |
詹永锋, 王洪波, 邓辉. 民国时期中国地理研究所钩沉[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(9): 1768-1777.
中国地理研究所是中国地理学史上第一个地理学专门研究机关,1940年8月1日成立于重庆北碚,1950年4月以该所为基础成立中国科学院地理研究所筹备处。抗日战争时期抗战建国事业对地理人才的迫切需求、朱家骅对在中国发展地理学的大力提倡、管理中英庚款董事会息金收入的资金支持和近代以来地理学专门研究机构的缺失共同构成中国地理研究所成立的历史背景。成立后的中国地理研究所吸引了一批优秀的地理学者,开展了广泛的地理实地考察,撰写了丰富的地理著作,出版了多种地理读物,培养了众多的地理学人才,为中华人民共和国成立后中国现代地理学的发展奠定了坚实的基础。
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[33] |
王国强. 中国共产党与科技社团的百年[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2022: 192-197.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[34] |
张国友, 黄剑, 朱竑, 等. 中国地理学会与《地理学报》的发展[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2197-2208.
中国地理学会前身是1909年在天津成立的中国地学会。1934年3月中国地理学会的成立与同年9月《地理学报》的创办,不仅是中国地理学科史上的大事,也是中国教育史乃至科学史上的亮点。这是新文化运动中所提倡“赛先生”,即科学观念不断在近代中国传播的重要节点。中国地理学会的成立,清晰地将近代地理学与传统舆地学分离开来,以独立学科的形态出现在中国历史舞台上。《地理学报》的创刊,则使中外地理学家们在中国开始享有高水准的专业学术窗口。这是中国地理学界仁人志士对“科学救国”“科技兴国”等思潮的实践。在中国地理学会的组织和推动下,老一代地理学家艰苦奋斗,将一系列重要的研究成果刊登在《地理学报》,中国地理学家在当时的国家顶层设计中占有了一席之地。虽然,当时对地理科学的重要性认知还主要停留在权力高层与专业学术圈内,但为后来中国地理科学的蓬勃发展播下了火种,也为唤醒普通民众的地理科学意识打下了坚实的科学基础。回顾历史,中国地理学会的成立与《地理学报》的创办可谓是中国地理科学的发轫,自此成为中国地理科学发展的推动者和见证者。值此中国地理学会创立110周年、《地理学报》创刊85周年之际,深入领会“不忘初心、牢记使命”,回顾中国地理学会与《地理学报》发展,以继承和发扬老一辈地理学家的精神,进一步推动地理科学发展,使之成为可持续发展的基础学科,更好地服务于国家建设,服务于人类命运共同体建设。
[
The current Geographical Society of China (GSC) is the product of a merger of the Chinese Geographical Society established in 1909 and the former Geographical Society of China established in 1934. The establishment of the GSC and the launch of the journal Acta Geographica Sinica in 1934 are not only two major events in the history of Chinese geography, but also two spotlights in the history of Chinese education and science. This is the key point of the concept of science advocated by the New Culture Movement. The establishment of GSC clearly separated modern geography from traditional geoscientology and entered on the historical stage in the name of science. What's more, the publication of Acta Geographica Sinica enabled Chinese and foreign geographers to enjoy a high-end professional academic source in China. The emergence of the society and its journal was also a direct manifestation of wartime concepts such as "science saves the country" and "invigorating China through science."Under the organization and promotion of the GSC, the older generation of geographers worked hard and published a series of important articles in the Acta Geographica Sinica. The modern geographers who worked tirelessly finally drew the attention of the ruling class and occupied a place in the top-down design of the country. Although their understanding of the importance was mainly in the high-level and professional academic circles, it planted the seed for the later vigorous development of Chinese geographic science and laid a solid scientific foundation for awakening the ordinary people. In retrospect, the establishment of GSC and Acta Geographica Sinica was the beginning of Chinese geographic science and has become the promoter and witness of the development of Chinese geographic science. On the 110th anniversary of the founding of the GSC, we should inherit the spirit of the older generation of scientists, enrich the geographic science, provide better service for the construction of the country, and improve the scientific literacy of ordinary people. {{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[35] |
赵济, 朱良. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院院史: 1902—2012[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2014: 4.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[36] |
郭玉珊, 和晓江, 孙俊, 等. 1980年以来中国高等地理教育机构的发展: 类型、增长与分布演变[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1911-1924.
为了厘清中国高等地理教育机构发展脉络,论文基于多种类型资料,梳理了1980—2021年中国高等地理教育机构的专业、沿革、停办数据,从类型、增长、分布3个层面讨论其发展过程,并探讨其当前主要问题。研究发现,近40余年中国高等地理教育机构发展有如下特征:① 主要分布在科研机构和高校中,且高校涉及综合、师范、工程与矿业等11类高校;② 地理学专业数量及其在机构中地位的差异使之有必要区分学科机构与专业机构;③ 数量增长包括1980—1998年稳定增长、1999—2009年快速增长、2010—2021年波动增长3个阶段,并主要受高校地理院系增长的影响,不同阶段不同类型高校地理院系增长又有差异;④ 分布演变可分为与数量增长时段相一致的省级稳定扩展、省级与地市级双轨快速扩展、省级与地市级双轨缓慢扩展3个阶段,不同类型机构空间分布及扩展态势也存在差异。当前中国高等地理教育机构已形成学科机构为主体、专业机构为扩展翼的发展态势,但有必要加强学科认同和学科共同体建设,以避免多样化发展可能引起的误解,改变仍然存在的高校学科院系“名实不符”现象,降低高校专业院系停办风险。
[
Based on data on the establishment, change, and closure of undergraduate and graduate programs in higher education institutions of geography in China from 1980 to 2021 extracted from a variety of sources, this article discussed the development process of these institutions from three perspectives—types, growth, and distribution—and the current main issues they are facing. The following results were obtained. First, higher education institutions of geography include research institutions and departments at universities/colleges. Universities/colleges running geography departments could be divided into 11 categories: comprehensive, normal, engineering and mining, agriculture and forestry, technology and information, city and architecture, finance and economics, tourism, ethnic, language, and military universities/colleges. Second, it is necessary to divide geography institutions into "discipline" and "major," considering the difference in the number of geography majors in different institutions. Third, the development of higher education geography institutions can be divided into three stages: 1980-1998, stable growth period; 1999-2009, rapid growth period; and 2010-2021, fluctuating growth period. The various types of universities/colleges that run geography departments affect the growth of geography institutions in different stages. Fourth, the distribution of geography institutions can be divided into three stages: provincial stable expansion (1980-1998), provincial-prefecture level fast expansion (1999-2009), and provincial-prefecture level continuous expansion (2010-2021). Furthermore, there are differences in the spatial distribution and expansion trend of various types of universities/colleges that run geography departments. In the past 40 years, the types, growth, and distribution of higher education institutions of geography in China have been continuously optimized. Recently, there has been a development momentum of forming institutions with geography as a discipline as the core body and institutions with geography as a major as extended space. While this is a healthy development, it is also necessary to strengthen the disciplinary identity and communities in order to avoid the misunderstanding that geography is not a unified discipline for its diversified development, to alter the common phenomenon that "geography" or "geographic sciences" is disappearing from department names, and to reduce the risk of major institutions being closed. {{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[37] |
赵歆. 中国地理学期刊编辑出版研究的综述[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(11): 1437-1443.
通过全面收集和系统整理中国地理学类期刊编辑发表的编辑出版研究成果,总结分析中国地理期刊在期刊发展方面的特点,包括地理期刊的总体发展、主要期刊的发展历程、英文期刊的发展、中外期刊发展对比等。概括分析了中国主要地理期刊载文、人文地理学科刊文、主要期刊引文分析等方面的统计结果。最后,对中国地理期刊编辑在期刊与学科发展关系、期刊选题和办刊思路、提高期刊编辑质量、防止稿件重复发表、电脑与网络使用方法等5方面的研究做出了全面总结。
[
Based on the literature of editing and publishing research of geography journals, this article firstly presents the characteristics of China’s journal development, including development of geography journal groups, core journals and English journals, as well as comparisons of geography journals at home and abroad. Then we make a statistical analysis of the papers published in major geography journals, papers related to human geography, and papers cited in core journals. Finally, we summarize what the Chinese geography editors have done in some aspects such as journal and geographical development, manuscript topic and idea creation, editing quality enhancement, plagiarism and duplication prevention, and computer and network application to editing and publishing. Some conclusions can be drawn in this study: Chinese geographers, especially editors, have done much research on the development and comparison of geography journals of China and other countries. In recent years, the number of papers focusing on the development of geography journals has been increasing. The geography journal editors not only are engaged in word editing, but also record the achievements obtained in Chinese geographical research. Meanwhile, they have been tracking the international trend of disciplinary development. Hence, in the past decades, the Chinese geography editors have made their due contributions to improving academic quality, leading the disciplinary orientation, promoting academic exchange, and perfecting the evaluation system of science periodicals. {{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[38] |
姚正平. 近20年民国史地期刊研究的回顾与展望[J]. 武陵学刊, 2013, 38(3): 94-98.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[39] |
王庸. 中国地理学史[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1938: 1.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[40] |
侯仁之. 中国古代地理学简史[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1962: 1.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[41] |
王成组. 中国地理学史(上册)[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982: 1.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[42] |
盛叙功. 西洋地理学史[M]. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社, 1992: 6.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[43] |
张其昀. 中国地理学研究[M]. 台北: 台湾中华文化出版事业委员会, 1955.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[44] |
鞠继武. 中国地理学发展史[M]. 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 1987: 5-7.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[45] |
潘晟. 知识、礼俗与政治: 宋代地理术的知识社会史探[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2018: 1-15.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[46] |
马玉山. 中国地理学思想史发凡[C]// 复旦大学历史地理研究中心. 谭其骧先生百年诞辰纪念文集. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2012: 262-272.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[47] |
毛曦, 何小莲. 地理学思想史研究中值得注意的几个问题[J]. 中国历史地理论丛, 2000, 15(3): 235-240.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[48] |
潘玉君. 地理学思想史: 通论和年表[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019: 1-10.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[49] |
汤茂林. 李旭旦先生的学术翻译及其反映的学术理念[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(7): 1364-1374.
李旭旦先生在一生中译著无数,其中为学界所重者莫过于《人地学原理》、《海陆的起源》、《地理学思想史》、《国外地理科学文献选译》。改革开放以来,李先生花了大量宝贵的时间从事学术翻译,其实大有深意。他将翻译作为其复兴全面的人文地理学大业的一部分,是走向世界的基础性工作,也是高水平研究的基础之一,他对学术翻译的重视还隐含了其对学术讨论和对话的重视。目前,我们对世界人文地理学发展仍比较隔膜,为了避免20 世纪50 年代学习苏联时犯下的错误,必须大力迻译国际上的重要研究成果,全面了解国际上的学术状况,形成我们自己的判断,然后确定我们的研究论题和研究方法,从事原创性的研究,编写出世界水准的教科书和著作,走向世界。需要提升学术翻译在学术评价中的地位,这也是李先生翻译工作给我们的启示之一。
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[50] |
方维规. 什么是概念史[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2020: 9-30.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[51] |
王庸. 中国地理学史[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1955: 2.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[52] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[53] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[54] |
石硕. 20世纪历史地理研究对“中华民族”概念的贡献[J]. 民族研究, 2023(1): 12-20, 142-143.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |