生物多样性 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 24306. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024306 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024306
冯嘉谊(), 练琚愉(
), 冯瑜莙(
), 张东旭(
), 曹洪麟(
), 叶万辉*(
)(
)
收稿日期:
2024-07-09
接受日期:
2024-11-26
出版日期:
2024-12-20
发布日期:
2025-01-10
通讯作者:
E-mail: 基金资助:
Jiayi Feng(), Juyu Lian(
), Yujun Feng(
), Dongxu Zhang(
), Honglin Cao(
), Wanhui Ye*(
)(
)
Received:
2024-07-09
Accepted:
2024-11-26
Online:
2024-12-20
Published:
2025-01-10
Contact:
E-mail: Supported by:
摘要: 群落的垂直分层是物种间生态功能分化后的结果, 在森林植物物种共存格局的形成中起着重要作用。为此, 本研究基于鼎湖山20 ha森林动态监测样地中树种的重要功能性状、群落动态数据及群落上下层的空间结构关系, 并在台风对垂直分层结构的影响背景下, 利用Lee’s L相关性分析及多元空间自回归模型分析了群落上层对群落下层结构和功能的影响。结果表明: 群落上层的植物功能性状变化可较好地解释群落下层的大部分群落结构和功能的空间变化。群落上层的空间结构、光合及水分利用效率等特性对群落下层的结构和功能有着重要的影响。群落上层物种对光资源的捕获和利用能力越强, 其群落下层的物种多度、物种丰富度、物种多样性、相对生长速率及补员率越小; 群落上层物种对水分利用能力越强, 群落下层的物种多度、物种丰富度、物种多样性、相对生长速率及补员率越大。其中, 群落上层的单位面积叶片最大净光合速率、叶面积、叶片鲜重、叶柄直径及边材比导率是关键性状, 在影响群落下层的结构和功能上起着相对重要的作用。台风造成群落垂直分层结构改变后, 群落上层对群落下层功能和结构的影响也随之发生变化。本研究表明群落垂直分层特性对群落的结构和功能有重要的影响。
冯嘉谊, 练琚愉, 冯瑜莙, 张东旭, 曹洪麟, 叶万辉 (2024) 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落垂直分层对群落结构及功能的影响. 生物多样性, 32, 24306. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024306.
Jiayi Feng, Juyu Lian, Yujun Feng, Dongxu Zhang, Honglin Cao, Wanhui Ye (2024) Effects of vertical stratification on community structure and functions in a subtropical, evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Dinghushan National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 32, 24306. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024306.
性状 Traits | 灌木层 vs. 亚灌层 Shrub layer vs. sub-shrub layer | 亚灌层 vs. 林冠下层 Sub-shrub layer vs. lower canopy layer | 林冠下层 vs. 林冠中层 Lower canopy layer vs. middle canopy layer | 林冠中层 vs. 林冠上层 Middle canopy layer vs. upper canopy layer |
---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Maximum area-based leaf carbon assimilation rate (Aarea) | 0.440*** | 0.272*** | 0.066*** | 0.092*** |
瞬时水分利用效率 Instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) | 0.369*** | 0.216*** | 0.285*** | 0.059* |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 Maximum area-based stomatal conductance (gsa) | 0.308*** | 0.241*** | 0.114*** | 0.051 |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Phosphorus concentration per leaf mass (Pmass) | 0.545*** | 0.526*** | 0.340*** | 0.297*** |
边材比导率 Xylem specific conductivity (Ks) | 0.468*** | 0.343*** | 0.203*** | 0.070* |
叶片膨压丧失点 Water potential at leaf turgor loss point (TLP) | 0.497*** | 0.355*** | 0.223*** | 0.184*** |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA) | 0.370*** | 0.458*** | 0.294*** | 0.164*** |
叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content (Chl) | 0.369*** | 0.379*** | 0.009 | 0.068** |
叶面积 Leaf area (LA) | 0.528*** | 0.411*** | 0.053*** | 0.030* |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (LT) | 0.265*** | 0.071*** | 0.145*** | 0.219*** |
木材密度 Wood density (WD) | 0.393*** | 0.316*** | 0.118*** | 0.089*** |
叶干物质含量 Leaf dry mass content (LDMC) | 0.354*** | 0.184*** | 0.150*** | 0.170*** |
叶柄长度 Petiole length (Pl) | 0.481*** | 0.510*** | 0.149*** | -0.056** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Petiole dry weight/fresh weight ratio (Pdm) | 0.333*** | 0.242*** | 0.176*** | 0.248*** |
叶柄直径 Petiole diameter (Pd) | 0.373*** | 0.167*** | 0.154*** | 0.018 |
叶片光补偿点 Leaf compensation point (LCP) | 0.241*** | 0.339*** | 0.323*** | 0.115*** |
叶片光饱和点 Leaf saturation point (LSP) | 0.303*** | 0.063* | 0.069*** | 0.070*** |
叶片鲜重 Leaf fresh weight (LFW) | 0.564*** | 0.384*** | 0.224*** | 0.125*** |
树冠宽度 Crown breadth (Bc) | 0.151*** | 0.117*** | 0.110*** | 0.095** |
树冠深度 Crown depth (Dc) | 0.011 | 0.125*** | 0.083*** | 0.088*** |
表1 南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落下层各个植物功能性状与群落上层对应性状的相关性(Lee’s L统计量)
Table 1 The relationship (Lee’s L statistic) between trait of the lower-layer and the corresponding trait of the upper-layer in subtropical, evergreen broad-leaved forest
性状 Traits | 灌木层 vs. 亚灌层 Shrub layer vs. sub-shrub layer | 亚灌层 vs. 林冠下层 Sub-shrub layer vs. lower canopy layer | 林冠下层 vs. 林冠中层 Lower canopy layer vs. middle canopy layer | 林冠中层 vs. 林冠上层 Middle canopy layer vs. upper canopy layer |
---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Maximum area-based leaf carbon assimilation rate (Aarea) | 0.440*** | 0.272*** | 0.066*** | 0.092*** |
瞬时水分利用效率 Instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) | 0.369*** | 0.216*** | 0.285*** | 0.059* |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 Maximum area-based stomatal conductance (gsa) | 0.308*** | 0.241*** | 0.114*** | 0.051 |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Phosphorus concentration per leaf mass (Pmass) | 0.545*** | 0.526*** | 0.340*** | 0.297*** |
边材比导率 Xylem specific conductivity (Ks) | 0.468*** | 0.343*** | 0.203*** | 0.070* |
叶片膨压丧失点 Water potential at leaf turgor loss point (TLP) | 0.497*** | 0.355*** | 0.223*** | 0.184*** |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA) | 0.370*** | 0.458*** | 0.294*** | 0.164*** |
叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content (Chl) | 0.369*** | 0.379*** | 0.009 | 0.068** |
叶面积 Leaf area (LA) | 0.528*** | 0.411*** | 0.053*** | 0.030* |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (LT) | 0.265*** | 0.071*** | 0.145*** | 0.219*** |
木材密度 Wood density (WD) | 0.393*** | 0.316*** | 0.118*** | 0.089*** |
叶干物质含量 Leaf dry mass content (LDMC) | 0.354*** | 0.184*** | 0.150*** | 0.170*** |
叶柄长度 Petiole length (Pl) | 0.481*** | 0.510*** | 0.149*** | -0.056** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Petiole dry weight/fresh weight ratio (Pdm) | 0.333*** | 0.242*** | 0.176*** | 0.248*** |
叶柄直径 Petiole diameter (Pd) | 0.373*** | 0.167*** | 0.154*** | 0.018 |
叶片光补偿点 Leaf compensation point (LCP) | 0.241*** | 0.339*** | 0.323*** | 0.115*** |
叶片光饱和点 Leaf saturation point (LSP) | 0.303*** | 0.063* | 0.069*** | 0.070*** |
叶片鲜重 Leaf fresh weight (LFW) | 0.564*** | 0.384*** | 0.224*** | 0.125*** |
树冠宽度 Crown breadth (Bc) | 0.151*** | 0.117*** | 0.110*** | 0.095** |
树冠深度 Crown depth (Dc) | 0.011 | 0.125*** | 0.083*** | 0.088*** |
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性 指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | ‒0.151 | ‒0.077** | 0.025 | 0.100*** | 0.231*** | 0.079*** | 0.171*** |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | 0.080*** | 0.044* | 0.024 | ‒0.028** | 0.182*** | ‒0.018* | 0.07*** |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | ‒0.173** | 0.003 | 0.154*** | 0.229*** | 0.037* | 0.206*** | 0.142*** |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.176** | 0.009* | 0.153*** | 0.221*** | ‒0.113** | 0.308*** | 0.158*** |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.244** | ‒0.106** | 0.112*** | 0.258*** | 0.062*** | 0.177*** | 0.183*** |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.078** | ‒0.119** | ‒0.124** | ‒0.054** | ‒0.283** | 0.025** | ‒0.038** |
比叶面积 SLA | ‒0.138** | ‒0.023 | 0.090*** | 0.166*** | ‒0.160** | 0.230*** | 0.096*** |
叶绿素含量 Chl | 0.087*** | ‒0.054** | ‒0.162** | ‒0.196** | 0.085*** | ‒0.272** | ‒0.126** |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.113** | ‒0.031 | 0.051*** | 0.115*** | ‒0.208** | 0.163*** | 0.063*** |
叶片厚度 LT | 0.004 | ‒0.010* | 0.013 | 0.020 | ‒0.024 | ‒0.064** | ‒0.015 |
木材密度 WD | 0.164*** | ‒0.021* | ‒0.192** | ‒0.259** | ‒0.019 | ‒0.294** | ‒0.188** |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | ‒0.018 | 0.061*** | 0.140*** | 0.130*** | 0.116*** | 0.088*** | 0.117*** |
叶柄长度 Pl | ‒0.120** | ‒0.030 | 0.061*** | 0.127*** | ‒0.169** | 0.177*** | 0.094*** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.077*** | 0.033 | ‒0.016* | ‒0.070** | 0.151*** | ‒0.072** | 0.038** |
叶柄直径 Pd | ‒0.047** | ‒0.102** | ‒0.126** | ‒0.075** | ‒0.193** | ‒0.099** | ‒0.101** |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | 0.055*** | 0.068*** | 0.118*** | 0.094*** | ‒0.133** | 0.073*** | 0.040** |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | ‒0.058** | 0.114*** | 0.217*** | 0.217*** | ‒0.171** | 0.146*** | ‒0.006 |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.092** | 0.024** | 0.120*** | 0.165*** | ‒0.325** | 0.177*** | 0.019 |
树冠宽度 Bc | ‒0.021 | ‒0.019 | 0.004 | 0.013 | ‒0.105** | ‒0.020 | ‒0.048** |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.057** | ‒0.130** | ‒0.130** | ‒0.074** | 0.146*** | ‒0.057** | 0.043** |
表2 灌木层的物种多度、物种丰富度、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数、相对生长速率、死亡率及补员率与亚灌层功能性状的相关性(Lee’s L统计量)
Table 2 The relationship (Lee’s L statistic) between species abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou evenness index, relative growth rate, mortality rate and recruitment rate of the shrub layer and the plant functional trait of the sub-shrub layer
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性 指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | ‒0.151 | ‒0.077** | 0.025 | 0.100*** | 0.231*** | 0.079*** | 0.171*** |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | 0.080*** | 0.044* | 0.024 | ‒0.028** | 0.182*** | ‒0.018* | 0.07*** |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | ‒0.173** | 0.003 | 0.154*** | 0.229*** | 0.037* | 0.206*** | 0.142*** |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.176** | 0.009* | 0.153*** | 0.221*** | ‒0.113** | 0.308*** | 0.158*** |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.244** | ‒0.106** | 0.112*** | 0.258*** | 0.062*** | 0.177*** | 0.183*** |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.078** | ‒0.119** | ‒0.124** | ‒0.054** | ‒0.283** | 0.025** | ‒0.038** |
比叶面积 SLA | ‒0.138** | ‒0.023 | 0.090*** | 0.166*** | ‒0.160** | 0.230*** | 0.096*** |
叶绿素含量 Chl | 0.087*** | ‒0.054** | ‒0.162** | ‒0.196** | 0.085*** | ‒0.272** | ‒0.126** |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.113** | ‒0.031 | 0.051*** | 0.115*** | ‒0.208** | 0.163*** | 0.063*** |
叶片厚度 LT | 0.004 | ‒0.010* | 0.013 | 0.020 | ‒0.024 | ‒0.064** | ‒0.015 |
木材密度 WD | 0.164*** | ‒0.021* | ‒0.192** | ‒0.259** | ‒0.019 | ‒0.294** | ‒0.188** |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | ‒0.018 | 0.061*** | 0.140*** | 0.130*** | 0.116*** | 0.088*** | 0.117*** |
叶柄长度 Pl | ‒0.120** | ‒0.030 | 0.061*** | 0.127*** | ‒0.169** | 0.177*** | 0.094*** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.077*** | 0.033 | ‒0.016* | ‒0.070** | 0.151*** | ‒0.072** | 0.038** |
叶柄直径 Pd | ‒0.047** | ‒0.102** | ‒0.126** | ‒0.075** | ‒0.193** | ‒0.099** | ‒0.101** |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | 0.055*** | 0.068*** | 0.118*** | 0.094*** | ‒0.133** | 0.073*** | 0.040** |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | ‒0.058** | 0.114*** | 0.217*** | 0.217*** | ‒0.171** | 0.146*** | ‒0.006 |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.092** | 0.024** | 0.120*** | 0.165*** | ‒0.325** | 0.177*** | 0.019 |
树冠宽度 Bc | ‒0.021 | ‒0.019 | 0.004 | 0.013 | ‒0.105** | ‒0.020 | ‒0.048** |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.057** | ‒0.130** | ‒0.130** | ‒0.074** | 0.146*** | ‒0.057** | 0.043** |
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性 指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | ‒0.093** | ‒0.064** | 0.012 | 0.060*** | 0.097*** | 0.037* | 0.154*** |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | 0.170*** | 0.124*** | 0.094*** | 0.022** | ‒0.218** | 0.035*** | ‒0.061** |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | ‒0.118** | ‒0.025 | 0.066*** | 0.098*** | 0.053*** | 0.084*** | 0.134*** |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.123** | 0.008* | 0.095*** | 0.103*** | 0.004 | 0.108*** | 0.174*** |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.172** | ‒0.071** | 0.082*** | 0.160*** | 0.042** | 0.059*** | 0.168*** |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.165** | ‒0.093** | ‒0.008 | 0.054*** | ‒0.066** | 0.001 | 0.047*** |
比叶面积 SLA | ‒0.046** | 0.092*** | 0.168*** | 0.130*** | ‒0.117** | 0.128*** | 0.138*** |
叶绿素含量 Chl | ‒0.033** | ‒0.118** | ‒0.112** | ‒0.050** | ‒0.068** | ‒0.106** | ‒0.181** |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.109** | ‒0.041** | 0.027*** | 0.049*** | ‒0.026** | 0.054*** | 0.124*** |
叶片厚度 LT | ‒0.157** | ‒0.205** | ‒0.155** | ‒0.033** | 0.106*** | ‒0.075** | ‒0.032* |
木材密度 WD | 0.147*** | 0.033* | ‒0.056** | ‒0.091** | ‒0.100** | ‒0.113** | ‒0.154** |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | 0.106*** | 0.057*** | ‒0.008 | ‒0.064** | 0.031*** | ‒0.022 | ‒0.065** |
叶柄长度 Pl | ‒0.102** | ‒0.009 | 0.062*** | 0.064*** | ‒0.070** | 0.074*** | 0.112*** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.117*** | 0.012 | ‒0.100** | ‒0.148** | 0.082*** | ‒0.086** | ‒0.062** |
叶柄直径 Pd | ‒0.206** | ‒0.216** | ‒0.137** | ‒0.015 | 0.095*** | ‒0.055** | 0.060*** |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | 0.027 | 0.059*** | 0.163*** | 0.151*** | ‒0.362** | 0.094*** | ‒0.041** |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | ‒0.024* | ‒0.016 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.013 | 0.108*** | 0.018 | 0.031** |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.143** | ‒0.042** | 0.071*** | 0.108*** | ‒0.084** | 0.067*** | 0.117*** |
树冠宽度 Bc | ‒0.023* | ‒0.039** | ‒0.058** | ‒0.052** | ‒0.034** | ‒0.068** | ‒0.085** |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.169** | ‒0.204** | ‒0.105** | 0.017 | ‒0.033* | ‒0.017 | ‒0.082** |
表3 亚灌层的物种多度、物种丰富度、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数、相对生长速率、死亡率及补员率与林冠下层功能性状的相关性(Lee’s L统计量)
Table 3 The relationship (Lee’s L statistic) between species abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou evenness index, relative growth rate, mortality rate and recruitment rate of the sub-shrub layer and the plant functional trait of the lower canopy
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性 指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | ‒0.093** | ‒0.064** | 0.012 | 0.060*** | 0.097*** | 0.037* | 0.154*** |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | 0.170*** | 0.124*** | 0.094*** | 0.022** | ‒0.218** | 0.035*** | ‒0.061** |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | ‒0.118** | ‒0.025 | 0.066*** | 0.098*** | 0.053*** | 0.084*** | 0.134*** |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.123** | 0.008* | 0.095*** | 0.103*** | 0.004 | 0.108*** | 0.174*** |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.172** | ‒0.071** | 0.082*** | 0.160*** | 0.042** | 0.059*** | 0.168*** |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.165** | ‒0.093** | ‒0.008 | 0.054*** | ‒0.066** | 0.001 | 0.047*** |
比叶面积 SLA | ‒0.046** | 0.092*** | 0.168*** | 0.130*** | ‒0.117** | 0.128*** | 0.138*** |
叶绿素含量 Chl | ‒0.033** | ‒0.118** | ‒0.112** | ‒0.050** | ‒0.068** | ‒0.106** | ‒0.181** |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.109** | ‒0.041** | 0.027*** | 0.049*** | ‒0.026** | 0.054*** | 0.124*** |
叶片厚度 LT | ‒0.157** | ‒0.205** | ‒0.155** | ‒0.033** | 0.106*** | ‒0.075** | ‒0.032* |
木材密度 WD | 0.147*** | 0.033* | ‒0.056** | ‒0.091** | ‒0.100** | ‒0.113** | ‒0.154** |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | 0.106*** | 0.057*** | ‒0.008 | ‒0.064** | 0.031*** | ‒0.022 | ‒0.065** |
叶柄长度 Pl | ‒0.102** | ‒0.009 | 0.062*** | 0.064*** | ‒0.070** | 0.074*** | 0.112*** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.117*** | 0.012 | ‒0.100** | ‒0.148** | 0.082*** | ‒0.086** | ‒0.062** |
叶柄直径 Pd | ‒0.206** | ‒0.216** | ‒0.137** | ‒0.015 | 0.095*** | ‒0.055** | 0.060*** |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | 0.027 | 0.059*** | 0.163*** | 0.151*** | ‒0.362** | 0.094*** | ‒0.041** |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | ‒0.024* | ‒0.016 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.013 | 0.108*** | 0.018 | 0.031** |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.143** | ‒0.042** | 0.071*** | 0.108*** | ‒0.084** | 0.067*** | 0.117*** |
树冠宽度 Bc | ‒0.023* | ‒0.039** | ‒0.058** | ‒0.052** | ‒0.034** | ‒0.068** | ‒0.085** |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.169** | ‒0.204** | ‒0.105** | 0.017 | ‒0.033* | ‒0.017 | ‒0.082** |
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | ‒0.102** | ‒0.104** | ‒0.096** | 0.025* | ‒0.012 | 0.002 | ‒0.005 |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | 0.130*** | 0.077*** | 0.055*** | ‒0.081** | ‒0.087** | 0.050* | ‒0.027* |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | ‒0.095** | ‒0.094** | ‒0.094** | 0.012 | 0.030 | ‒0.005 | 0.027* |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.073** | ‒0.112** | ‒0.113** | ‒0.032* | 0.007 | 0.048*** | 0.097*** |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.126** | ‒0.141** | ‒0.132** | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.014* | 0.082** |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.007 | ‒0.024 | ‒0.035 | ‒0.026 | 0.024 | 0.030*** | 0.060*** |
比叶面积 SLA | 0.036* | 0.006 | ‒0.005 | ‒0.029 | 0.016 | 0.035** | 0.078*** |
叶绿素含量 Chl | 0.022* | ‒0.020 | ‒0.029* | ‒0.050** | ‒0.056** | 0.022* | 0.008 |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.101** | ‒0.090** | ‒0.068** | 0.040** | 0.026** | ‒0.024 | 0.033** |
叶片厚度 LT | ‒0.044** | 0.013 | 0.037*** | 0.080*** | 0.092*** | ‒0.053** | 0.016 |
木材密度 WD | 0.150*** | 0.147*** | 0.128*** | ‒0.031* | ‒0.009 | 0.007 | ‒0.013 |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | 0.076*** | 0.090*** | 0.081*** | ‒0.011 | ‒0.034** | ‒0.010 | ‒0.105** |
叶柄长度 Pl | ‒0.045** | ‒0.063** | ‒0.064** | ‒0.006 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.048** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.005 | 0.067*** | 0.086*** | 0.087*** | 0.031** | ‒0.041** | ‒0.082** |
叶柄直径 Pd | ‒0.136** | ‒0.116** | ‒0.089** | 0.052*** | 0.025* | ‒0.035* | 0.017 |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | 0.072*** | 0.005 | ‒0.013 | ‒0.106** | ‒0.099** | 0.041 | ‒0.011 |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | 0.002 | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.025*** | ‒0.008 | ‒0.017 | ‒0.019 |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.096** | ‒0.112** | ‒0.108** | ‒0.006 | 0.046*** | 0.033** | 0.111*** |
树冠宽度 Bc | ‒0.009 | 0.018 | 0.024 | 0.030 | ‒0.016* | ‒0.050** | ‒0.049** |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.101** | ‒0.132** | ‒0.123** | ‒0.029** | ‒0.012 | ‒0.003 | 0.027* |
表4 林冠下层的物种多度、物种丰富度、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数、相对生长速率、死亡率及补员率与林冠中层功能性状的相关性(Lee’s L统计量)
Table 4 The relationship (Lee’s L statistic) between species abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou evenness index, relative growth rate, mortality rate and recruitment rate of the lower canopy and the plant functional trait of the middle canopy
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | ‒0.102** | ‒0.104** | ‒0.096** | 0.025* | ‒0.012 | 0.002 | ‒0.005 |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | 0.130*** | 0.077*** | 0.055*** | ‒0.081** | ‒0.087** | 0.050* | ‒0.027* |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | ‒0.095** | ‒0.094** | ‒0.094** | 0.012 | 0.030 | ‒0.005 | 0.027* |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.073** | ‒0.112** | ‒0.113** | ‒0.032* | 0.007 | 0.048*** | 0.097*** |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.126** | ‒0.141** | ‒0.132** | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.014* | 0.082** |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.007 | ‒0.024 | ‒0.035 | ‒0.026 | 0.024 | 0.030*** | 0.060*** |
比叶面积 SLA | 0.036* | 0.006 | ‒0.005 | ‒0.029 | 0.016 | 0.035** | 0.078*** |
叶绿素含量 Chl | 0.022* | ‒0.020 | ‒0.029* | ‒0.050** | ‒0.056** | 0.022* | 0.008 |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.101** | ‒0.090** | ‒0.068** | 0.040** | 0.026** | ‒0.024 | 0.033** |
叶片厚度 LT | ‒0.044** | 0.013 | 0.037*** | 0.080*** | 0.092*** | ‒0.053** | 0.016 |
木材密度 WD | 0.150*** | 0.147*** | 0.128*** | ‒0.031* | ‒0.009 | 0.007 | ‒0.013 |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | 0.076*** | 0.090*** | 0.081*** | ‒0.011 | ‒0.034** | ‒0.010 | ‒0.105** |
叶柄长度 Pl | ‒0.045** | ‒0.063** | ‒0.064** | ‒0.006 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.048** |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.005 | 0.067*** | 0.086*** | 0.087*** | 0.031** | ‒0.041** | ‒0.082** |
叶柄直径 Pd | ‒0.136** | ‒0.116** | ‒0.089** | 0.052*** | 0.025* | ‒0.035* | 0.017 |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | 0.072*** | 0.005 | ‒0.013 | ‒0.106** | ‒0.099** | 0.041 | ‒0.011 |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | 0.002 | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.025*** | ‒0.008 | ‒0.017 | ‒0.019 |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.096** | ‒0.112** | ‒0.108** | ‒0.006 | 0.046*** | 0.033** | 0.111*** |
树冠宽度 Bc | ‒0.009 | 0.018 | 0.024 | 0.030 | ‒0.016* | ‒0.050** | ‒0.049** |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.101** | ‒0.132** | ‒0.123** | ‒0.029** | ‒0.012 | ‒0.003 | 0.027* |
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | 0.011 | ‒0.01 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.032* | 0.025* | 0.011 | 0.001 |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | ‒0.018 | ‒0.015 | 0.004 | 0.027 | ‒0.022 | 0.002 | ‒0.002 |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | 0.015 | 0.018 | ‒0.001 | ‒0.014 | 0.039* | 0.003 | 0.005 |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.091** | ‒0.064** | ‒0.061** | 0.064*** | 0.001 | 0.043* | 0.027 |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.094** | ‒0.093** | ‒0.086** | 0.038 | 0.002 | 0.042* | 0.023 |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.076** | ‒0.033** | ‒0.041** | 0.058*** | ‒0.002 | ‒0.011 | 0.017 |
比叶面积 SLA | ‒0.070** | ‒0.032** | ‒0.041** | 0.031* | ‒0.008 | ‒0.027 | 0.022 |
叶绿素含量 Chl | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.027 | ‒0.002 | 0.010 | 0.016 |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.007 | ‒0.033 | ‒0.023 | ‒0.020* | ‒0.003 | 0.035 | ‒0.006 |
叶片厚度 LT | 0.075*** | 0.053*** | 0.041** | ‒0.064** | ‒0.021 | ‒0.064** | 0.006 |
木材密度 WD | 0.042* | 0.063*** | 0.052** | 0.011 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.031 | 0.006 |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | 0.068*** | 0.057*** | 0.067*** | ‒0.025 | 0.014 | 0.002 | ‒0.036 |
叶柄长度 Pl | 0.045** | 0.037** | 0.040*** | ‒0.031* | ‒0.009 | 0.018 | ‒0.032* |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.079*** | 0.036** | 0.035*** | ‒0.082** | 0.01 | ‒0.009 | ‒0.023 |
叶柄直径 Pd | 0.014* | ‒0.019 | ‒0.011 | ‒0.017 | 0.003 | 0.044 | ‒0.006 |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | ‒0.052** | ‒0.029 | ‒0.012 | 0.065*** | ‒0.022 | 0.003 | ‒0.011 |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | 0.028 | 0.035 | 0.028 | ‒0.025 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.037 | ‒0.011 |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.093** | ‒0.093** | ‒0.092** | 0.055** | ‒0.014 | 0.039* | 0.026 |
树冠宽度 Bc | 0.009 | 0.025** | 0.022* | 0.018 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.018 | 0.012 |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.064** | ‒0.067** | ‒0.060** | 0.046* | 0.046* | 0.067* | 0.019* |
表5 林冠中层的物种多度、物种丰富度、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数、相对生长速率、死亡率及补员率与林冠上层功能性状的相关性(Lee’s L统计量)
Table 5 The relationship (Lee’s L statistic) between species abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou evenness index, relative growth rate, mortality rate and recruitment rate of the middle canopy and the plant functional trait of the upper canopy
性状 Trait | 物种多度 Species abundance | 物种丰富度 Species richness | Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 相对生长速率Relative growth rate | 死亡率 Mortality rate | 补员率 Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单位面积叶片最大净光合速率 Aarea | 0.011 | ‒0.01 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.032* | 0.025* | 0.011 | 0.001 |
瞬时水分利用效率 WUEi | ‒0.018 | ‒0.015 | 0.004 | 0.027 | ‒0.022 | 0.002 | ‒0.002 |
单位面积叶片最大气孔导度 gsa | 0.015 | 0.018 | ‒0.001 | ‒0.014 | 0.039* | 0.003 | 0.005 |
单位质量叶片磷含量 Pmass | ‒0.091** | ‒0.064** | ‒0.061** | 0.064*** | 0.001 | 0.043* | 0.027 |
边材比导率 Ks | ‒0.094** | ‒0.093** | ‒0.086** | 0.038 | 0.002 | 0.042* | 0.023 |
叶片膨压丧失点 TLP | ‒0.076** | ‒0.033** | ‒0.041** | 0.058*** | ‒0.002 | ‒0.011 | 0.017 |
比叶面积 SLA | ‒0.070** | ‒0.032** | ‒0.041** | 0.031* | ‒0.008 | ‒0.027 | 0.022 |
叶绿素含量 Chl | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.027 | ‒0.002 | 0.010 | 0.016 |
叶面积 LA | ‒0.007 | ‒0.033 | ‒0.023 | ‒0.020* | ‒0.003 | 0.035 | ‒0.006 |
叶片厚度 LT | 0.075*** | 0.053*** | 0.041** | ‒0.064** | ‒0.021 | ‒0.064** | 0.006 |
木材密度 WD | 0.042* | 0.063*** | 0.052** | 0.011 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.031 | 0.006 |
叶干物质含量 LDMC | 0.068*** | 0.057*** | 0.067*** | ‒0.025 | 0.014 | 0.002 | ‒0.036 |
叶柄长度 Pl | 0.045** | 0.037** | 0.040*** | ‒0.031* | ‒0.009 | 0.018 | ‒0.032* |
叶柄干重/鲜重比 Pdm | 0.079*** | 0.036** | 0.035*** | ‒0.082** | 0.01 | ‒0.009 | ‒0.023 |
叶柄直径 Pd | 0.014* | ‒0.019 | ‒0.011 | ‒0.017 | 0.003 | 0.044 | ‒0.006 |
叶片光补偿点 LCP | ‒0.052** | ‒0.029 | ‒0.012 | 0.065*** | ‒0.022 | 0.003 | ‒0.011 |
叶片光饱和点 LSP | 0.028 | 0.035 | 0.028 | ‒0.025 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.037 | ‒0.011 |
叶片鲜重 LFW | ‒0.093** | ‒0.093** | ‒0.092** | 0.055** | ‒0.014 | 0.039* | 0.026 |
树冠宽度 Bc | 0.009 | 0.025** | 0.022* | 0.018 | ‒0.014 | ‒0.018 | 0.012 |
树冠深度 Dc | ‒0.064** | ‒0.067** | ‒0.060** | 0.046* | 0.046* | 0.067* | 0.019* |
灌木层 vs. 亚灌层 Shrub layer vs. sub-shrub layer | 亚灌层 vs. 林冠下层 Sub-shrub layer vs. lower canopy layer | 林冠下层 vs. 林冠中层 Lower canopy layer vs. middle canopy layer | 林冠中层 vs. 林冠上层 Middle canopy layer vs. upper canopy layer | |
---|---|---|---|---|
物种多度 Species abundance | WUEi: ‒0.119, gsa: 0.073, Ks: ‒0.141*, TLP: ‒0.203**, LA: 0.077, WD: 0.219*, LDMC: ‒0.108, Pdm: 0.082, Pd: ‒0.071, LCP: 0.138*, Dc: ‒0.128*** (R2 = 0.429) | Ks: ‒0.053, TLP: ‒0.184***, Chl: ‒0.061, LA: 0.247**, LT: ‒0.086**, WD: 0.223***, LDMC: ‒0.072, LCP: ‒0.015, LSP: 0.071*, LFW: ‒0.205*, Bc: 0.039, Dc: ‒0.078* (R2 = 0.613) | Aarea: ‒0.106, WUEi: 0.115, gsa: 0.082, Pmass: ‒0.162*, LT: ‒0.045, Pl: 0.050, Pdm: ‒0.118, LCP: ‒0.060, Dc: ‒0.183*** (R2 = 0.286) | Aarea: 0.388*, gsa: ‒0.211, Pmass: 0.199, Ks: ‒0.458***, TLP: 0.370**, SLA: 0.285*, LA: ‒0.413, LT: 0.034, WD: 0.097, Pdm: 0.130, Pd: 1.100***, LSP: ‒0.114, LFW: ‒0.202*, Dc: ‒0.338*** (R2 = 0.283) |
物种丰富度 Species richness | Aarea: ‒0.225*, WUEi: ‒0.136, gsa: 0.195, Pmass: 0.072, TLP: ‒0.242**, SLA: ‒0.329**, Chl: ‒0.168, WD: 0.252, Pdm: 0.149*, Pd: ‒0.182, LCP: 0.065, LSP: 0.097, LFW: 0.219*, Dc: ‒0.077* (R2 = 0.406) | Aarea: ‒0.014, gsa: 0.031, TLP: ‒0.161***, Chl: ‒0.087, LT: ‒0.040, WD: 0.101*, LDMC: 0.063, Bc: 0.068*, Dc: ‒0.123** (R2 = 0.488) | Aarea: ‒0.176*, WUEi: 0.196**, gsa: 0.152, Pmass: ‒0.16*, Chl: ‒0.048, LA: 0.077, LT: ‒0.042, Pdm: ‒0.076, LCP: ‒0.115, Bc: 0.091*, Dc: ‒0.182*** (R2 = 0.354) | Aarea: 0.445**, gsa: ‒0.184, Pmass: 0.264***, Ks: ‒0.413**, TLP: 0.392**, WD: 0.244***, Pd: 0.569**, LSP: ‒0.145*, LFW: ‒0.219*, Dc: ‒0.327*** (R2 = 0.154) |
Shannon-Wiener 多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Aarea: ‒0.203*, WUEi: ‒0.127, gsa: 0.198, TLP: ‒0.179*, Chl: ‒0.166, LA: ‒0.295*, LT: 0.220***, WD: 0.174, LDMC: 0.284***, Pd: ‒0.187, LSP: 0.089, LFW: 0.390*** (R2 = 0.487) | Aarea: ‒0.157, WUEi: 0.147*, gsa: 0.151, Ks: 0.096, SLA: 0.158, Chl: ‒0.124*, LA: ‒0.577***, LDMC: 0.295***, Pdm: ‒0.069, Pd: 0.173, LSP: ‒0.055, LFW: 0.372*** (R2 = 0.477) | TLP: ‒0.176***, LA: 0.265**, WD: 0.138**, Pd: ‒0.337***, LCP: ‒0.093*, LFW: ‒0.062, Bc: 0.099* (R2 = 0.299) | WUEi: 0.169**, Pmass: 0.130*, Ks: ‒0.302***, TLP: 0.163, WD: 0.153**, Pd: 0.403*, LCP: ‒0.180**, Dc: ‒0.309*** (R2 = 0.106) |
Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | Aarea: ‒0.269*, gsa: 0.154*, Ks: 0.229**, Chl: ‒0.141*, LA: ‒0.270*, LT: 0.137**, LDMC: 0.289**, Pdm: ‒0.057, LFW: 0.249* (R2 = 0.489) | Aarea: ‒0.248**, WUEi: 0.216**, gsa: 0.130, Ks: 0.221***, TLP: 0.114*, LA: ‒0.467***, WD: ‒0.244***, LDMC: 0.088*, Pd: 0.114*, LCP: 0.040, LSP: ‒0.051, LFW: 0.322**, Bc: ‒0.016 (R2 = 0.517) | LA: 0.111, LDMC: ‒0.088, Pdm: 0.149**, LSP: ‒0.091*, LFW: ‒0.127 (R2 = 0.094) | Ks: 0.126*, Pd: ‒0.088, LCP: 0.121*, LSP: ‒0.120 (R2 = 0.068) |
相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | Aarea: 0.603**, WUEi: ‒0.137, gsa: ‒0.517***, Ks: ‒0.183*, Chl: 0.308**, LA: 1.140***, WD: ‒0.413***, LDMC: ‒0.261***, Pl: ‒0.599***, Pd: ‒0.501***, LCP: ‒0.212***, LSP: 0.281***, LFW: ‒0.614***, Bc: 0.083*, Dc: 0.044 (R2 = 0.510) | Aarea: 0.211*, gsa: ‒0.353***, Ks: 0.139, SLA: ‒0.077, Chl: ‒0.020, LA: 0.277*, WD: ‒0.050, LDMC: ‒0.125, Pl: ‒0.197, Pdm: 0.129, Pd: ‒0.198, LCP: ‒0.271***, LSP: 0.143** (R2 = 0.422) | gsa: 0.100, Chl: ‒0.067, LA: ‒0.166**, LT: 0.098, LFW: 0.135* (R2 = 0.073) | Ks: 0.192*, Pd: ‒0.674***, Dc: 0.395***, TLP: ‒0.379** (R2 = 0.046) |
补员率 Recruitment rate | gsa: 0.152*, TLP: 0.183*, Chl: 0.187, LA: 0.169, WD: ‒0.155, Pd: ‒0.269**, LSP: ‒0.096, Bc: ‒0.071, Dc: 0.113** (R2 = 0.205) | Aarea: 0.301***, WUEi: 0.066, gsa: ‒0.241**, Pmass: 0.310***, Chl: ‒0.117*, LA: ‒0.353**, LT: 0.096*, LFW: 0.229*, Bc: ‒0.067 (R2 = 0.281) | gsa: ‒0.210**, Ks: 0.270***, Chl: ‒0.166**, LA: ‒0.522***, LT: 0.093, Pl: 0.138, Pdm: ‒0.146*, Pd: 0.220*, LCP: ‒0.110, LFW: 0.285*** (R2 = 0.140) | Pmass: ‒0.234, Ks: 0.435**, TLP: ‒0.714***, Chl: 0.151, LT: ‒0.126, Pdm: ‒0.197, Pd: ‒0.859***, LCP: ‒0.307**, LSP: 0.240*, LFW: 0.355***, Dc: 0.198* (R2 = 0.080) |
死亡率 Mortality rate | Aarea: ‒0.492***, gsa: 0.169, Pmass: 0.738***, Ks: 0.314***, SLA: ‒0.181*, WD: 0.274, Pd: ‒0.101, LCP: 0.145**, LSP: ‒0.039, LFW: ‒0.246**, Bc: ‒0.115**, Dc: 0.055 (R2 = 0.395) | Aarea: ‒0.107, WUEi: 0.149**, gsa: 0.155, Pmass: 0.270***, TLP: ‒0.157**, Chl: ‒0.080, LT: 0.160***, LDMC: 0.116, Pdm: ‒0.157*, LSP: ‒0.103* (R2 = 0.272) | Aarea: 0.482***, gsa: ‒0.486***, Pmass: 0.195**, Ks: ‒0.283**, Chl: ‒0.196**, LA: ‒0.468***, Pl: 0.292***, LFW: 0.140, Dc: 0.217*** (R2 = 0.107) | LA: 0.216, LT: ‒0.059, Pd: ‒0.295, Bc: ‒0.082*, Dc: 0.161** (R2 = 0.039) |
表6 群落下层结构及功能与群落上层功能性状的多元空间自回归系数
Table 6 The multivariate spatial autoregressive regression coefficient of structural and functional characteristics in the lower-layer with traits in the upper-layer of the community
灌木层 vs. 亚灌层 Shrub layer vs. sub-shrub layer | 亚灌层 vs. 林冠下层 Sub-shrub layer vs. lower canopy layer | 林冠下层 vs. 林冠中层 Lower canopy layer vs. middle canopy layer | 林冠中层 vs. 林冠上层 Middle canopy layer vs. upper canopy layer | |
---|---|---|---|---|
物种多度 Species abundance | WUEi: ‒0.119, gsa: 0.073, Ks: ‒0.141*, TLP: ‒0.203**, LA: 0.077, WD: 0.219*, LDMC: ‒0.108, Pdm: 0.082, Pd: ‒0.071, LCP: 0.138*, Dc: ‒0.128*** (R2 = 0.429) | Ks: ‒0.053, TLP: ‒0.184***, Chl: ‒0.061, LA: 0.247**, LT: ‒0.086**, WD: 0.223***, LDMC: ‒0.072, LCP: ‒0.015, LSP: 0.071*, LFW: ‒0.205*, Bc: 0.039, Dc: ‒0.078* (R2 = 0.613) | Aarea: ‒0.106, WUEi: 0.115, gsa: 0.082, Pmass: ‒0.162*, LT: ‒0.045, Pl: 0.050, Pdm: ‒0.118, LCP: ‒0.060, Dc: ‒0.183*** (R2 = 0.286) | Aarea: 0.388*, gsa: ‒0.211, Pmass: 0.199, Ks: ‒0.458***, TLP: 0.370**, SLA: 0.285*, LA: ‒0.413, LT: 0.034, WD: 0.097, Pdm: 0.130, Pd: 1.100***, LSP: ‒0.114, LFW: ‒0.202*, Dc: ‒0.338*** (R2 = 0.283) |
物种丰富度 Species richness | Aarea: ‒0.225*, WUEi: ‒0.136, gsa: 0.195, Pmass: 0.072, TLP: ‒0.242**, SLA: ‒0.329**, Chl: ‒0.168, WD: 0.252, Pdm: 0.149*, Pd: ‒0.182, LCP: 0.065, LSP: 0.097, LFW: 0.219*, Dc: ‒0.077* (R2 = 0.406) | Aarea: ‒0.014, gsa: 0.031, TLP: ‒0.161***, Chl: ‒0.087, LT: ‒0.040, WD: 0.101*, LDMC: 0.063, Bc: 0.068*, Dc: ‒0.123** (R2 = 0.488) | Aarea: ‒0.176*, WUEi: 0.196**, gsa: 0.152, Pmass: ‒0.16*, Chl: ‒0.048, LA: 0.077, LT: ‒0.042, Pdm: ‒0.076, LCP: ‒0.115, Bc: 0.091*, Dc: ‒0.182*** (R2 = 0.354) | Aarea: 0.445**, gsa: ‒0.184, Pmass: 0.264***, Ks: ‒0.413**, TLP: 0.392**, WD: 0.244***, Pd: 0.569**, LSP: ‒0.145*, LFW: ‒0.219*, Dc: ‒0.327*** (R2 = 0.154) |
Shannon-Wiener 多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index | Aarea: ‒0.203*, WUEi: ‒0.127, gsa: 0.198, TLP: ‒0.179*, Chl: ‒0.166, LA: ‒0.295*, LT: 0.220***, WD: 0.174, LDMC: 0.284***, Pd: ‒0.187, LSP: 0.089, LFW: 0.390*** (R2 = 0.487) | Aarea: ‒0.157, WUEi: 0.147*, gsa: 0.151, Ks: 0.096, SLA: 0.158, Chl: ‒0.124*, LA: ‒0.577***, LDMC: 0.295***, Pdm: ‒0.069, Pd: 0.173, LSP: ‒0.055, LFW: 0.372*** (R2 = 0.477) | TLP: ‒0.176***, LA: 0.265**, WD: 0.138**, Pd: ‒0.337***, LCP: ‒0.093*, LFW: ‒0.062, Bc: 0.099* (R2 = 0.299) | WUEi: 0.169**, Pmass: 0.130*, Ks: ‒0.302***, TLP: 0.163, WD: 0.153**, Pd: 0.403*, LCP: ‒0.180**, Dc: ‒0.309*** (R2 = 0.106) |
Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | Aarea: ‒0.269*, gsa: 0.154*, Ks: 0.229**, Chl: ‒0.141*, LA: ‒0.270*, LT: 0.137**, LDMC: 0.289**, Pdm: ‒0.057, LFW: 0.249* (R2 = 0.489) | Aarea: ‒0.248**, WUEi: 0.216**, gsa: 0.130, Ks: 0.221***, TLP: 0.114*, LA: ‒0.467***, WD: ‒0.244***, LDMC: 0.088*, Pd: 0.114*, LCP: 0.040, LSP: ‒0.051, LFW: 0.322**, Bc: ‒0.016 (R2 = 0.517) | LA: 0.111, LDMC: ‒0.088, Pdm: 0.149**, LSP: ‒0.091*, LFW: ‒0.127 (R2 = 0.094) | Ks: 0.126*, Pd: ‒0.088, LCP: 0.121*, LSP: ‒0.120 (R2 = 0.068) |
相对生长速率 Relative growth rate | Aarea: 0.603**, WUEi: ‒0.137, gsa: ‒0.517***, Ks: ‒0.183*, Chl: 0.308**, LA: 1.140***, WD: ‒0.413***, LDMC: ‒0.261***, Pl: ‒0.599***, Pd: ‒0.501***, LCP: ‒0.212***, LSP: 0.281***, LFW: ‒0.614***, Bc: 0.083*, Dc: 0.044 (R2 = 0.510) | Aarea: 0.211*, gsa: ‒0.353***, Ks: 0.139, SLA: ‒0.077, Chl: ‒0.020, LA: 0.277*, WD: ‒0.050, LDMC: ‒0.125, Pl: ‒0.197, Pdm: 0.129, Pd: ‒0.198, LCP: ‒0.271***, LSP: 0.143** (R2 = 0.422) | gsa: 0.100, Chl: ‒0.067, LA: ‒0.166**, LT: 0.098, LFW: 0.135* (R2 = 0.073) | Ks: 0.192*, Pd: ‒0.674***, Dc: 0.395***, TLP: ‒0.379** (R2 = 0.046) |
补员率 Recruitment rate | gsa: 0.152*, TLP: 0.183*, Chl: 0.187, LA: 0.169, WD: ‒0.155, Pd: ‒0.269**, LSP: ‒0.096, Bc: ‒0.071, Dc: 0.113** (R2 = 0.205) | Aarea: 0.301***, WUEi: 0.066, gsa: ‒0.241**, Pmass: 0.310***, Chl: ‒0.117*, LA: ‒0.353**, LT: 0.096*, LFW: 0.229*, Bc: ‒0.067 (R2 = 0.281) | gsa: ‒0.210**, Ks: 0.270***, Chl: ‒0.166**, LA: ‒0.522***, LT: 0.093, Pl: 0.138, Pdm: ‒0.146*, Pd: 0.220*, LCP: ‒0.110, LFW: 0.285*** (R2 = 0.140) | Pmass: ‒0.234, Ks: 0.435**, TLP: ‒0.714***, Chl: 0.151, LT: ‒0.126, Pdm: ‒0.197, Pd: ‒0.859***, LCP: ‒0.307**, LSP: 0.240*, LFW: 0.355***, Dc: 0.198* (R2 = 0.080) |
死亡率 Mortality rate | Aarea: ‒0.492***, gsa: 0.169, Pmass: 0.738***, Ks: 0.314***, SLA: ‒0.181*, WD: 0.274, Pd: ‒0.101, LCP: 0.145**, LSP: ‒0.039, LFW: ‒0.246**, Bc: ‒0.115**, Dc: 0.055 (R2 = 0.395) | Aarea: ‒0.107, WUEi: 0.149**, gsa: 0.155, Pmass: 0.270***, TLP: ‒0.157**, Chl: ‒0.080, LT: 0.160***, LDMC: 0.116, Pdm: ‒0.157*, LSP: ‒0.103* (R2 = 0.272) | Aarea: 0.482***, gsa: ‒0.486***, Pmass: 0.195**, Ks: ‒0.283**, Chl: ‒0.196**, LA: ‒0.468***, Pl: 0.292***, LFW: 0.140, Dc: 0.217*** (R2 = 0.107) | LA: 0.216, LT: ‒0.059, Pd: ‒0.295, Bc: ‒0.082*, Dc: 0.161** (R2 = 0.039) |
图1 群落下层物种多度(A)、物种丰富度(B)、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(C)、Pielou均匀度指数(D)、相对生长速率(E)、补员率(F)和死亡率(G)与群落上层功能性状在台风前、后的多元空间自回归模型中的回归结果。Year2020: 2020年(台风后)。性状缩写含义见表1。
Fig. 1 The regression results of species abundance (A), species richness (B), Shannon-Wiener diversity index (C), Pielou evenness index (D), relative growth rate (E), recruitment rate (F), and mortality rate (G) in the lower-layer with traits in the upper-layer of the community in a multivariable linear regression model fitting by pre- and post-typhoon data. Year 2020, Year 2020 (after the typhoon). Code of traits see Table 1.
[1] |
Adler PB, Fajardo A, Kleinhesselink AR, Kraft NJB (2013) Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. Ecology Letters, 16, 1294-1306.
DOI PMID |
[2] | Adler PB, Salguero-Gómez R, Compagnoni A, Hsu JS, Ray-Mukherjee J, Mbeau-Ache C, Franco M (2014) Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 740-745. |
[3] | Anderegg WRL, Klein T, Bartlett M, Sack L, Pellegrini AFA, Choat B, Jansen S (2016) Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 5024-5029. |
[4] |
Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2012) The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: A global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 15, 393-405.
DOI PMID |
[5] |
Bartlett MK, Zhang Y, Kreidler N, Sun SW, Ardy R, Cao KF, Sack L (2014) Global analysis of plasticity in turgor loss point, a key drought tolerance trait. Ecology Letters, 17, 1580-1590.
DOI PMID |
[6] | Birkinshaw C, Randrianjanahary M (2009) The effects of cyclone Hudah on the forest of Masoala Peninsula, Madagascar. Madagascar Conservation & Development, 2, 17-20. |
[7] | Bivand R, Millo G, Piras G (2021) A review of software for spatial econometrics in R. Mathematics, 9, 1276. |
[8] | Bivand RS, Gómez-Rubio V, Rue H (2015) Spatial data analysis with R-INLA with some extensions. Journal of Statistical Software, 63, 1-31. |
[9] |
Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters, 12, 351-366.
DOI PMID |
[10] | Chen XD, Li XG, Wang JX (1997) The plant community highness class construction of Yangtze River shelter forest in Guansi River Valley, Mianyang City. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 21, 376-385. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[陈晓德, 李旭光, 王金锡 (1997) 绵阳官司河流域长江防护林的群落高度级结构分析. 植物生态学报, 21, 376-385.] | |
[11] | Chen YX, Uriarte M, Wright SJ, Yu SX (2019) Effects of neighborhood trait composition on tree survival differ between drought and postdrought periods. Ecology, 100, e02766. |
[12] | Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 343-366. |
[13] | Condit R (1998) Tropical Forest Census Plots: Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a Comparison with Other Plots. Springer, Berlin. |
[14] | Condit R, Ashton PS, Manokaran N, LaFrankie JV, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1999) Dynamics of the forest communities at Pasoh and Barro Colorado: Comparing two 50-ha plots. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 354, 1739-1748. |
[15] | Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51, 335-380. |
[16] |
Craine JM, Reich PB (2005) Leaf-level light compensation points in shade-tolerant woody seedlings. New Phytologist, 166, 710-713.
PMID |
[17] | Crandall RM, Chew YM, Fill JM, Kreye JK, Varner JM, Kobziar LN (2024) Pine trees structure plant biodiversity patterns in savannas. Ecology and Evolution, 14, e70021. |
[18] |
Croft H, Chen JM, Luo XZ, Bartlett PA, Chen BZ, Staebler RM (2017) Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology, 23, 3513-3524.
DOI PMID |
[19] |
Deans RM, Brodribb TJ, Busch FA, Farquhar GD (2020) Optimization can provide the fundamental link between leaf photosynthesis, gas exchange and water relations. Nature Plants, 6, 1116-1125.
DOI PMID |
[20] | Dixon P (2003) VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 927-930. |
[21] |
Dormann CF, Bagnara M, Boch S, Hinderling J, Janeiro-Otero A, Schäfer D, Schall P, Hartig F (2020) Plant species richness increases with light availability, but not variability, in temperate forests understorey. BMC Ecology, 20, 43.
DOI PMID |
[22] |
Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 10, 1135-1142.
DOI PMID |
[23] |
Enríquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K, Nielsen SL (1996) Broad-scale comparison of photosynthetic rates across phototrophic organisms. Oecologia, 108, 197-206.
DOI PMID |
[24] | Falster DS, Westoby M (2005) Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia. Journal of Ecology, 93, 521-535. |
[25] | Fischer A, Marshall P, Camp A (2013) Disturbances in deciduous temperate forest ecosystems of the northern hemisphere: Their effects on both recent and future forest development. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 1863-1893. |
[26] |
Forrester DI (2015) Transpiration and water-use efficiency in mixed-species forests versus monocultures: Effects of tree size, stand density and season. Tree Physiology, 35, 289-304.
DOI PMID |
[27] | Forrester DI, Theiveyanathan S, Collopy JJ, Marcar NE (2010) Enhanced water use efficiency in a mixed Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 1761-1770. |
[28] | Fu LY, Sun H, Sharma RP, Lei YC, Zhang HR, Tang SZ (2013) Nonlinear mixed-effects crown width models for individual trees of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in south-central China. Forest Ecology and Management, 302, 210-220. |
[29] | Fyllas NM, Patiño S, Baker TR, Bielefeld Nardoto G, Martinelli LA, Quesada CA, Paiva R, Schwarz M, Horna V, Mercado LM, Santos A, Arroyo L, Jiménez EM, Luizão FJ, Neill DA, Silva N, Prieto A, Rudas A, Silviera M, Vieira ICG, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Malhi Y, Phillips OL, Lloyd J (2009) Basin-wide variations in foliar properties of Amazonian forest: Phylogeny, soils and climate. Biogeosciences, 6, 2677-2708. |
[30] | Gao BJ, Zhang ZZ, Li ZY (1992) Studies on the influence of closed forest on the structure, diversity and stability of insect community. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 12, 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[高宝嘉, 张执中, 李镇宇 (1992) 封山育林对昆虫群落结构及多样性稳定性影响的研究. 生态学报, 12, 1-7.] | |
[31] | Geng LH, Zhang JK (1997) The relationship between the weight of rosette leaf and the yield of Chinese cabbage. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 28, 347-350. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[耿丽华, 张金科 (1997) 大白菜莲座叶鲜重及其与产量的关系. 山东农业大学学报, 28, 347-350.] | |
[32] |
Greenwood S, Ruiz-Benito P, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lloret F, Kitzberger T, Allen CD, Fensham R, Laughlin DC, Kattge J, Bönisch G, Kraft NJB, Jump AS (2017) Tree mortality across biomes is promoted by drought intensity, lower wood density and higher specific leaf area. Ecology Letters, 20, 539-553.
DOI PMID |
[33] | Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 111, 1169-1194. |
[34] | Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews, 52, 107-145. |
[35] | Han YP, Li XM, Liu YC (1999) The relationship between vertical structure and species diversity of the secondary succession of the forests on the Jinyun Mountain. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 21, 391-396. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[韩玉萍, 李雪梅, 刘玉成 (1999) 缙云山森林群落次生演替序列的垂直结构与物种多样性的关系. 西南农业大学学报, 21, 391-396.] | |
[36] |
He PC, Gleason SM, Wright IJ, Weng ES, Liu H, Zhu SD, Lu MZ, Luo Q, Li RH, Wu GL, Yan ER, Song YJ, Mi XC, Hao GY, Reich PB, Wang YP, Ellsworth DS, Ye Q (2020) Growing-season temperature and precipitation are independent drivers of global variation in xylem hydraulic conductivity. Global Change Biology, 26, 1833-1841.
DOI PMID |
[37] | He PC, Lian JY, Ye Q, Liu H, Zheng Y, Yu KL, Zhu SD, Li RH, Yin DY, Ye WH, Wright IJ (2022) How do functional traits influence tree demographic properties in a subtropical monsoon forest? Functional Ecology, 36, 3200-3210. |
[38] | Hernandez JO, Maldia LSJ, Park BB (2020) Research trends and methodological approaches of the impacts of windstorms on forests in tropical, subtropical, and temperate zones: Where are we now and how should research move forward? Plants, 9, 1709. |
[39] | Ibanez T, Keppel G, Menkes C, Gillespie TW, Lengaigne M, Mangeas M, Rivas-Torres G, Birnbaum P (2019) Globally consistent impact of tropical cyclones on the structure of tropical and subtropical forests. Journal of Ecology, 107, 279-292. |
[40] | Jack SB, Long JN (1992) Forest production and the organization of foliage within crowns and canopies. Forest Ecology and Management, 49, 233-245. |
[41] | Kamble PN, Giri SP, Mane RS, Tiwana A (2015) Estimation of chlorophyll content in young and adult leaves of some selected plants. Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 5, 306-310. |
[42] | Kassambara A (2023) ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr. (accessed on 2023-12-22) |
[43] | Kelly R, Healy K, Anand M, Baudraz MEA, Bahn M, Cerabolini BEL, Cornelissen JHC, Dwyer JM, Jackson AL, Kattge J, Niinemets Ü, Peñuelas J, Pierce SJ, Salguero- Gómez R, Buckley YM (2021) Climatic and evolutionary contexts are required to infer plant life history strategies from functional traits at a global scale. Ecology Letters, 24, 970-983. |
[44] |
Kenzo T, Inoue Y, Yoshimura M, Yamashita M, Tanaka-Oda A, Ichie T (2015) Height-related changes in leaf photosynthetic traits in diverse Bornean tropical rain forest trees. Oecologia, 177, 191-202.
DOI PMID |
[45] |
Kern CC, Montgomery RA, Reich PB, Strong TF (2013) Canopy gap size influences niche partitioning of the ground-layer plant community in a northern temperate forest. Journal of Plant Ecology, 6, 101-112.
DOI |
[46] | Kohyama T, Takada T (2009) The stratification theory for plant coexistence promoted by one-sided competition. Journal of Ecology, 97, 463-471 |
[47] |
Kraft NJB, Metz MR, Condit RS, Chave J (2010) The relationship between wood density and mortality in a global tropical forest data set. New Phytologist, 188, 1124-1136.
DOI PMID |
[48] | Kunert N, Schwendenmann L, Potvin C, Hölscher D (2012) Tree diversity enhances tree transpiration in a Panamanian forest plantation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 135-144. |
[49] | Lee SI (2001) Developing a bivariate spatial association measure: An integration of Pearson’s r and Moran’s I. Journal of Geographical Systems, 3, 369-385. |
[50] | Lei XD, Tang SZ (2002) Indicators on structural diversity within-stand: A review. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 38(3), 140-146. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[雷相东, 唐守正 (2002) 林分结构多样性指标研究综述. 林业科学, 38(3), 140-146.] | |
[51] | Lewis RJ, Bannar-Martin KH (2012) The impact of cyclone fanele on a tropical dry forest in Madagascar. Biotropica, 44, 135-140. |
[52] | Li GY, Yang DM, Sun SC (2008) Allometric relationships between lamina area, lamina mass and petiole mass of 93 temperate woody species vary with leaf habit, leaf form and altitude. Functional Ecology, 22, 557-564. |
[53] | Li JX, Xu WT, Xiong GM, Wang Y, Zhao CM, Lu ZJ, Li YL, Xie ZQ (2017) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and the empirical regulations in dominant woody plants of shrublands across southern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41, 31-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李家湘, 徐文婷, 熊高明, 王杨, 赵常明, 卢志军, 李跃林, 谢宗强 (2017) 中国南方灌丛优势木本植物叶的氮、磷含量及其影响因素. 植物生态学报, 41, 31-42.]
DOI |
|
[54] | Li RH, Zhu SD, Lian JY, Zhang H, Liu H, Ye WH, Ye Q (2021) Functional traits are good predictors of tree species abundance across 101 subtropical forest species in China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 541577. |
[55] | Li YP, Ni YL, Xu H, Lian JY, Ye WH (2021) Relationship between variation of plant functional traits and individual growth at different vertical layers in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan. Biodiversity Science, 29, 1186-1197. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李艳朋, 倪云龙, 许涵, 练琚愉, 叶万辉 (2021) 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林植物功能性状变异与不同垂直层次个体生长的关联. 生物多样性, 29, 1186-1197.]
DOI |
|
[56] | Lin TC, Hogan JA, Chang CT (2020) Tropical cyclone ecology: A scale-link perspective. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 594-604. |
[57] | Lindenmayer DB, Laurance WF (2017) The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biological Reviews, 92, 1434-1458. |
[58] | Long J, Tang M, Chen G (2021) Influence of strata-specific forest structural features on the regeneration of the evergreen broad-leaved forest in Tianmu Mountain. PLoS ONE, 16, e0247339. |
[59] |
Luo T, Yu FY, Lian JY, Wang JJ, Shen J, Wu ZF, Ye WH (2022) Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a lower subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21414. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[罗恬, 俞方圆, 练琚愉, 王俊杰, 申健, 吴志峰, 叶万辉 (2022) 冠层垂直高度对植物叶片功能性状的影响: 以鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林为例. 生物多样性, 30, 21414.]
DOI |
|
[60] | McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 178-185. |
[61] | Meinzer FC, Bond BJ, Warren JM, Woodruff DR (2005) Does water transport scale universally with tree size? Functional Ecology, 19, 558-565. |
[62] | Murrell DJ, Law R (2003) Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors. Ecology Letters, 6, 48-59. |
[63] | Ni YL, Wang TJ, Cao HL, Li YP, Bin Y, Zhang RY, Wang Y, Lian JY, Ye WH (2021) An old-growth subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest suffered more damage from Typhoon Mangkhut than an adjacent secondary forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 496, 119433. |
[64] |
Niinemets Ü, Al Afas N, Cescatti A, Pellis A, Ceulemans R (2004) Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light-interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations. Tree Physiology, 24, 141-154.
PMID |
[65] | Nock CA, Geihofer D, Grabner M, Baker PJ, Bunyavejchewin S, Hietz P (2009) Wood density and its radial variation in six canopy tree species differing in shade-tolerance in western Thailand. Annals of Botany, 104, 297-306. |
[66] | Otto MSG, Hubbard RM, Binkley D, Stape JL (2014) Dominant clonal Eucalyptus grandis × urophylla trees use water more efficiently. Forest Ecology and Management, 328, 117-121. |
[67] | Palmer MW, McAlister SD, Arévalo JR, DeCoster JK (2000) Changes in the understory during 14 years following catastrophic windthrow in two Minnesota forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11, 841-854. |
[68] | Pascarella JB, Mitchell Aide T, Zimmerman JK (2004) Short-term response of secondary forests to hurricane disturbance in Puerto Rico, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 199, 379-393. |
[69] | Peereman J, Aaron Hogan J, Lin TC (2022) Intraseasonal interactive effects of successive typhoons characterize canopy damage of forests in Taiwan: A remote sensing-based assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 521, 120430. |
[70] | Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, de Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD ter Steege H, van der Heijden MGA, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 61, 167-234. |
[71] | Poorter L, Markesteijn L (2008) Seedling traits determine drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Biotropica, 40, 321-331. |
[72] |
Poorter L, Wright SJ, Paz H, Ackerly DD, Condit R, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Harms KE, Licona JC, Martínez- Ramos M, Mazer SJ, Muller-Landau HC, Peña-Claros M, Webb CO, Wright IJ (2008) Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. Ecology, 89, 1908-1920.
DOI PMID |
[73] | Potvin C, Lechowicz MJ, Tardif S (1990) The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology, 71, 1389-1400. |
[74] |
Prado-Junior JA, Schiavini I, Vale VS, Raymundo D, Lopes SF, Poorter L (2017) Functional traits shape size-dependent growth and mortality rates of dry forest tree species. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10, 895-906.
DOI |
[75] | R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/. (accessed on 2023-12-22) |
[76] | Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning, USA, 94, 13730-13734. |
[77] | Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: Traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164, S143-S164. |
[78] | Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003) The “hydrology” of leaves: Co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1343-1356. |
[79] | Sanchez-Martinez P, Martínez-Vilalta J, Dexter KG, Segovia RA, Mencuccini M (2020) Adaptation and coordinated evolution of plant hydraulic traits. Ecology Letters, 23, 1599-1610. |
[80] |
Santiago LS, De Guzman ME, Baraloto C, Vogenberg JE, Brodie M, Hérault B, Fortunel C, Bonal D (2018) Coordination and trade-offs among hydraulic safety, efficiency and drought avoidance traits in Amazonian rainforest canopy tree species. New Phytologist, 218, 1015-1024.
DOI PMID |
[81] | Schnitzer SA, Carson WP (2001) Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology, 82, 913-919. |
[82] | Schulte PJ, Hinckley TM (1985) A comparison of pressure-volume curve data analysis techniques. Journal of Experimental Botany, 36, 1590-1602. |
[83] | Seidl R, Fernandes PM, Fonseca TF, Gillet F, Jönsson AM, Merganičová K, Netherer S, Arpaci A, Bontemps JD, Bugmann H, González-Olabarria JR, Lasch P, Meredieu C, Moreira F, Schelhaas MJ, Mohren F (2011) Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: A review. Ecological Modelling, 222, 903-924. |
[84] |
Sharp RE, Matthews MA, Boyer JS (1984) Kok effect and the quantum yield of photosynthesis: Light partially inhibits dark respiration. Plant Physiology, 75, 95-101.
DOI PMID |
[85] | Shen Y, Umaña MN, Li WB, Fang M, Chen YX, Lu HP, Yu SX (2019) Coordination of leaf, stem and root traits in determining seedling mortality in a subtropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 446, 285-292. |
[86] | Shipley B (2010) From Plant Traits to Vegetation Structure:Chance and Selection in the Assembly of Ecological Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[87] | Shugart HH, Saatchi S, Hall FG (2010) Importance of structure and its measurement in quantifying function of forest ecosystems. Journal of Geophysical Research- Biogeosciences, 115, G00E13. |
[88] | Song XJ, Zhang WX, Zhou J, Li YH (2020) A comparative analysis of the effect of typhoons Hato and Mangkhut on the wind and rain in Zhaoqing. Meteorology, 42(4), 23-26. (in Chinese) |
[宋晓君, 章文鑫, 周静, 李玉环 (2020) 台风“天鸽”和“山竹”对肇庆风雨影响的对比分析. 广东气象, 42(4), 23-26.] | |
[89] | Soudzilovskaia NA, Elumeeva TG, Onipchenko VG, Shidakov II, Salpagarova FS, Khubiev AB, Tekeev DK, Cornelissen JHC (2013) Functional traits predict relationship between plant abundance dynamic and long-term climate warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 18180-18184. |
[90] |
Sperry JS, Love DM (2015) What plant hydraulics can tell us about responses to climate-change droughts. New Phytologist, 207, 14-27.
DOI PMID |
[91] | Syvertsen JP, Lloyd J, McConchie C, Kriedemann PE, Farquhar GD (1995) On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment, 18, 149-157. |
[92] |
Tarin T, Nolan RH, Medlyn BE, Cleverly J, Eamus D (2020) Water-use efficiency in a semi-arid woodland with high rainfall variability. Global Change Biology, 26, 496-508.
DOI PMID |
[93] |
Uriarte M, Swenson NG, Chazdon RL, Comita LS, John Kress W, Erickson D, Forero-Montaña J, Zimmerman JK, Thompson J (2010) Trait similarity, shared ancestry and the structure of neighbourhood interactions in a subtropical wet forest: Implications for community assembly. Ecology Letters, 13, 1503-1514.
DOI PMID |
[94] | Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. |
[95] | Wang DX (1997) Using single leaf fresh weight to rapidly estimate aboveground biomass of Zea mays. Pratacultural Science, 14(2), 68-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王得贤 (1997) 用单叶鲜重速测青贮玉米地上生物量. 草业科学, 14(2), 68-70.] | |
[96] | Way DA, Oren R, Kroner Y (2015) The space-time continuum: The effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on trees and the importance of scaling. Plant, Cell & Environment, 38, 991-1007. |
[97] | Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995) Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: New questions from old patterns. Oikos, 74, 159-164. |
[98] | West GB, Enquist BJ, Brown JH (2009) A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 7040-7045. |
[99] | Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 125-159. |
[100] | Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 261-268. |
[101] | Wickham H (2016) ggplot2:Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. |
[102] | Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (1999) Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytologist, 143, 155-162. |
[103] | Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827. |
[104] |
Wright SJ, Kitajima K, Kraft NJB, Reich PB, Wright IJ, Bunker DE, Condit R, Dalling JW, Davies SJ, Díaz S, Engelbrecht BMJ, Harms KE, Hubbell SP, Marks CO, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Salvador CM, Zanne AE (2010) Functional traits and the growth-mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology, 91, 3664-3674.
PMID |
[105] | Wu GL, Chen DX, Zhou Z (2021) Contrasting hydraulic efficiency and photosynthesis strategy in differential successional stages of a subtropical forest in a karst region. Plants, 10, 2604. |
[106] | Wu ZY (1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[吴征镒 (1980) 中国植被. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[107] | Zang RG, Yang YC, Jiang YX (2001) Community structure and tree species diversity characteristics in a tropical montane rainforest in Bawangling Nature Reserve, Hainan Island. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25, 270-275. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[臧润国, 杨彦承, 蒋有绪 (2001) 海南岛霸王岭热带山地雨林群落结构及树种多样性特征的研究. 植物生态学报, 25, 270-275.] | |
[108] |
Zhou GY, Peng CH, Li YL, Liu SZ, Zhang QM, Tang XL, Liu JX, Yan JH, Zhang DQ, Chu GW (2013) A climate change-induced threat to the ecological resilience of a subtropical monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Southern China. Global Change Biology, 19, 1197-1210.
DOI PMID |
[1] | 靳川, 张子嘉, 底凯, 张卫荣, 乔栋, 程思源, 胡中民. 海南热带雨林植物光合荧光气体交换和叶功能性状数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(9): 24139-. |
[2] | 李艳朋, 盘李军, 陈洁, 许涵, 杨立新. 亚热带人工混交林叶功能性状对森林演替的响应规律及影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(7): 24049-. |
[3] | 艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-. |
[4] | 任嘉隆, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 严祺涵, 秦畅, 方静, 辛未冬, 刘继亮. 基于陷阱法采集的河西走廊戈壁荒漠甲虫数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23375-. |
[5] | 薛玉洁, 程安鹏, 李珊, 刘晓娟, 李景文. 亚热带森林中环境和物种多样性对灌木存活的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22443-. |
[6] | 宋亮, 吴毅, 胡海霞, 刘文耀, 中村彰宏, 陈亚军, 马克平. 基于塔吊的林冠科学研究进展及展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(12): 23363-. |
[7] | 罗彩访, 杨涛, 张秋雨, 王馨培, 沈泽昊. 滇中半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物的功能特征和功能多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23215-. |
[8] | 王健铭, 曲梦君, 王寅, 冯益明, 吴波, 卢琦, 何念鹏, 李景文. 青藏高原北部戈壁植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21503-. |
[9] | 罗恬, 俞方圆, 练琚愉, 王俊杰, 申健, 吴志峰, 叶万辉. 冠层垂直高度对植物叶片功能性状的影响: 以鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21414-. |
[10] | 付飞, 魏慧玉, 常育腾, 王备新, 陈凯. 澜沧江中游水生昆虫生活史和生态学性状多样性的海拔格局: 气候和土地利用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21332-. |
[11] | 林永一, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 高俊伟, 刘继亮. 河西走廊中部戈壁地表甲虫群落动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22343-. |
[12] | 雍青措姆, 习新强, 牛克昌. 高寒草甸植物物种丧失对草原毛虫的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22069-. |
[13] | 高程, 郭良栋. 微生物物种多样性、群落构建与功能性状研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 22429-. |
[14] | 李艳朋, 倪云龙, 许涵, 练琚愉, 叶万辉. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林植物功能性状变异与不同垂直层次个体生长的关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1186-1197. |
[15] | 张昭臣, 胡健波, 杨庆松, 练琚愉, 李步杭, 王希华, 叶万辉, 张健. 中国亚热带4个森林动态监测样地无人机可见光遥感影像数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1181-1185. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 141
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 199
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn 51La