国家矿山公园游憩满意度影响因素研究

摘要/Abstract

图/表 4

参考文献 38

Metrics

doi:10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2024.227

摘要：

建设国家矿山公园是矿业遗产资源游憩化利用的重要模式，探讨国家矿山公园游憩满意度及影响因素，对于提升其游憩利用水平具有重要的科学参考和实践价值。以可可托海稀有金属国家矿山公园为案例地，构建国家矿山公园游憩满意度评价指标体系，基于2022年实地调研数据，利用结构方程模型分析游憩满意度影响因素，并借助重要性-绩效表现（IPA）分析法探讨游憩满意度和影响程度之间的差异。结果表明:（1）可可托海稀有金属国家矿山公园游憩满意度评价体系包括5个维度，游客评价从高到低依次为工业旅游资源、园区景观环境、空间布局规划、公共基础设施、游憩活动体验。（2）游憩活动体验、空间布局规划、工业旅游资源、公共基础设施和园区景观环境5个维度对可可托海稀有金属国家矿山公园游憩满意度评价产生显著正向影响。（3）可可托海稀有金属国家矿山公园在园区景观环境维度表现较好，工业旅游资源、游憩活动体验与公共基础设施维度游客的满意度和影响程度差异较大，景区空间布局规划维度中不同观测指标的满意度和影响程度存在明显差异。

关键词: 国家矿山公园, 游憩满意度, 评价指标体系, 影响因素, 可可托海

Abstract:

The construction of national mining parks represents a vital approach to the recreational utilization of mining heritage resources. Investigating recreation satisfaction and its influencing factors provides valuable scientific and practical insights for enhancing recreational use. Using Koktokay Rare Metals National Mining Park in Altay Prefecture, Xinjiang, China as a case study, this research establishes an evaluation index system for recreation satisfaction in national mining parks, employs a structural equation model to analyze influencing factors, and applies importance-performance analysis (IPA) to explore differences in recreation satisfaction and influence levels based on 2022 field survey data. The findings are as follows: (1) The recreation satisfaction evaluation system for Koktokay Rare Metals National Mining Park comprises five dimensions. Tourists rated these dimensions from highest to lowest as follows: industrial tourism resources, park landscape environment, spatial layout planning, public infrastructure, and recreational activity experience. (2) The five dimensions—recreational activity experience, spatial layout planning, industrial tourism resources, public infrastructure, and park landscape environment—have significant positive impacts on recreation satisfaction in Koktokay Rare Metals National Mining Park. (3) Koktokay Rare Metals National Mining Park excels in the park’s landscape environment. However, considerable differences exist between satisfaction and importance in dimensions such as industrial tourism resources, recreational activity experience, and public infrastructure. Similarly, varying degrees of satisfaction and importance are observed within the spatial layout planning dimension.

Key words: national mining park, recreation satisfaction, evaluation index system, influencing factors, Koktokay

朱怡婷, 赵晨, 曹开军, 梁桂仙, 姚昊. 国家矿山公园游憩满意度影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2025, 48(3): 549-558.

ZHU Yiting, ZHAO Chen, CAO Kaijun, LIANG Guixian, YAO Hao. Influencing factors of recreation satisfaction in national mining park[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(3): 549-558.

表1

表2

国家矿山公园游憩满意度评价指标"

目标层（C）	制约层（F）	观测指标（Q）	具体内容描述
国家矿山公园游憩满意度（C）	空间布局规划（F1）	与周边环境的协调性（Q1）	景区能与周边环境风格相协调
		体现地方性特征（Q2）	景区能够展示可可托海镇地域性特色
		整体规划和布局（Q3）	景区整体规划设计和空间布局具有合理性
		园区交通通达性（Q4）	景区外部交通较为便利、可达性高
		停车场配置规划（Q5）	停车位的配置和数量能够满足游客需求
		园区内交通的便利性（Q6）	园区内部交通频次能够满足游客游览需求
	公共基础设施（F2）	休息设施建设水平（Q7）	休息设施的数量、质量能够满足游客需求
		餐饮设施建设水平（Q8）	餐饮设施的数量、质量能够满足游客需求
		公共活动空间的充足程度（Q9）	公共活动空间能够满足游客活动需求
		安全设施的完善程度（Q10）	消防、警示等安全设施完备
		指示系统的便利性（Q11）	标识系统指引设施完备，游客能够便捷游览
	工业旅游资源（F3）	工业遗产的独特性（Q12）	工业遗产资源类型、规模、内容具有代表性
		工业遗产的科学性（Q13）	工业遗产具有很高的科考、科普价值
		工业遗产的历史文化性（Q14）	工业遗产具有丰富的历史、文化价值
		工业遗产的旅游利用（Q15）	工业遗产资源向旅游转型的成效显著
	园区景观环境（F4）	环境治理状况（Q16）	园区环境治理状况良好、较为整洁
		工业建筑美感（Q17）	工业建筑物具有美观性
		工业景观品质（Q18）	工业再造景观具有特色且品质优良
		生态修复程度（Q19）	生态环境功能修复效果良好
	游憩活动体验（F5）	活动项目多样性（Q20）	景区活动项目丰富多样
		游览活动体验性（Q21）	景区游览活动具有较好的互动体验感
		工业主题游憩设施（Q22）	游憩场所的主题设施完备
		工业主题游憩活动氛围（Q23）	工业主题活动具有氛围感
		举办庆典与活动的质量（Q24）	举办庆典与活动的状况良好、效果显著

表2

图1

图2

[1]	杨德进. 大都市新产业空间发展及其城市空间结构响应[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2012.
	[Yang Dejin. Development of metropolitan new industrial space and the corresponding city space structure[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2012. ]
[2]	虞虎. 大都市传统工业区功能置换与休闲旅游开发模式——以北京石景山首钢工业区为例[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2015.
	[Yu Hu. Function replacement of traditional industrial zone in metropolis and development model of leisure tourism: Take Beijing Shijingshan Shougang industrial zone as an example[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015. ]
[3]	虞虎, 王开泳, 徐琳琳. 工业遗产资源游憩化利用研究及其启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5): 210-220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.05.2018161
	[Yu Hu, Wang Kaiyong, Xu Linlin. International experience and enlightenment of study of recreational utilization of industrial heritage resources[J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 210-220. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.05.2018161
[4]	国土资源部地质环境司. 中国国家矿山公园建设工作指南[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2007: 5.
	[Geological Environment Department of the Ministry of Land and Resources. National mining park construction guide of China[M]. Beijing: China Land Press, 2007: 5. ]
[5]	刘丽华, 何军, 韩福文. 我国东北地区近代工业遗产的基本特征及其文化解读——基于文物保护单位视角的分析[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(1): 200-207.
	[Liu Lihua, He Jun, Han Fuwen. The basic features and cultural of modern industrial heritage in northeast China: Analyzed as historical and cultural units under government protection[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(1): 200-207. ]
[6]	Canizares R, Maria D C. Protection and defence of the mining heritage in Spain[J]. Scripta Nova Revista Electrónica de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales, 2011, 15(361): 1-17.
[7]	Wang Q J, Wang Z H, Zhou J L, et al. Spatial identification and development sequence of coal mine tourism resources[J]. Sensors and Materials, 2020, 32(11): 3867, doi: 10.18494/sam.2020.2942.
[8]	汪秋菊, 周佳丽, 彭苏萍. 煤炭资源型城市矿山遗址旅游开发潜力测度与开发模式选择[J]. 中国工程科学, 2020, 22(6): 158-166. doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.06.021
	[Wang Qiuju, Zhou Jiali, Peng Suping. Potential measurement and mode selection of tourism development at mining sites of coal resource-based cities in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2020, 22(6): 158-166. ] doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.06.021
[9]	Meng F L, Zhi Y Q, Pang Y X. Assessment of the adaptive reuse potentiality of industrial heritage based on improved entropy TOPSIS method from the perspective of urban regeneration[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(9): 7735, doi: 10.3390/su15097735.
[10]	樊亚明, 李康明, 孙正阳. 工业遗产游憩化更新利用空间体验感知分析——以阳朔糖舍酒店为例[J]. 工业建筑, 2023, 53(12): 62-69.
	[Fan Yaming, Li Kangming, Sun Zhengyang. Spatial experience perception analysis of renewal and utilization of industrial heritage recreation: A case study of Yangshuo Tangshe Hotel[J]. Industrial Construction, 2023, 53(12): 62-69. ]
[11]	Han S H, Zhang H M. Progress and prospects in industrial heritage reconstruction and reuse research during the past five years: Review and outlook[J]. Land, 2022, 11(12): 2119, doi: 10.3390/land11122119.
[12]	Campbell G, Smith L, Wetherell M. Nostalgia and heritage: Potentials, mobilisations and effects introduction[J]. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2017, 23(7): 609-611.
[13]	高飞, 邵龙. 遗产线路视野下的中东铁路工业遗产价值评价与分级——以成高子-横道河子段为例[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(2): 100-105.
	[Gao Fei, Shao Long. Value evaluation of the Chinese eastern railway industrial heritage from the heritage route perspective: An example of Chenggaozi to Hengdaohezi section[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2018, 34(2): 100-105. ]
[14]	Jiang P, Shao L, Baas C. Interpretation of value advantage and sustainable tourism development for railway heritage in China based on the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(22): 6492, doi: 10.3390/su11226492.
[15]	马斌, 赵晨, 何双男. 工业遗产旅游价值评价及开发对策研究——以辽宁省为例[J]. 工业建筑, 2024, 54(3): 46-53.
	[Ma Bin, Zhao Chen, He Shuangnan. Research on the evaluation of tourism value of industrial heritage and its development countermeasures: Taking Liaoning Province as an example[J]. Industrial Construction, 2024, 54(3): 46-53. ]
[16]	汪秋菊, 彭苏萍. 废弃矿区游憩化利用研究评述与框架体系构建[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(6): 2150-2160.
	[Wang Qiuju, Peng Suping. Review of research on recreational utilization of abandoned mining areas and construction of research framework system[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(6): 2150-2160. ]
[17]	邵敏, 蔡沙沙, 赖启福. 自然景区游客感官印象对旅游体验质量的影响机制研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2023, 43(1): 52-64.
	[Shao Min, Cai Shasha, Lai Qifu. Study on the influencing mechanism of sensory impressions of tourists on the tourism experience quality in natural scenic spots[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2023, 43(1): 52-64. ]
[18]	李兰莉, 杨阿莉, 王纪云. 国家公园语境下森林公园游憩价值感知评估及优化——以马蹄寺森林公园为例[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(2): 164-171.
	[Li Lanli, Yang Ali, Wang Jiyun. Assessment and optimization of recreation value perception in forest parks in the context of national parks: A case study of Horseshoe Temple Forest Park[J]. Forest Resource Management, 2022(2): 164-171. ]
[19]	李興来, 肖景义. 青海祁连风光游憩区生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态科学, 2022, 41(2): 124-130.
	[Li Xinglai, Xiao Jingyi. Study on the evaluation of ecosystem service value in Qilian recreation area of Qinghai Province[J]. Ecological Science, 2022, 41(2): 124-130. ]
[20]	胡佳媛, 刘灵豫, 代勤龙, 等. 基于AHP-GIS的生态旅游适宜性评价——以大熊猫国家公园小相岭片区及周边社区为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024(3): 1-11.
	[Hu Jiayuan, Liu Lingyu, Dai Qinlong, et al. Evaluation of ecotourism suitability based on AHP-GIS: Taking Xiaoxiangling area of the giant panda national park and the surrounding communities as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024(3): 1-11. ]
[21]	王凌, 郑俊禧, 叶昌东. 多尺度空间特征思考下的工业遗产差异化更新——以广州市两处食品加工类工业遗产为例[J]. 南方建筑, 2024(1): 96-106.
	[Wang Ling, Zheng Junxi, Ye Changdong. Differentiated renewal of industrial heritage under the reflection of multi-scale spatial characteristics: A case study of two industrial heritage food processing sites in Guangzhou[J]. South Architecture, 2024(1): 96-106. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2024.01.012
[22]	Liu F Y, Zhao Q, Yang Y L. An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster-Shafer theory[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2018(7): 210-220.
[23]	Wang S J, Duan W, Zheng X D. Post-occupancy evaluation of brownfield reuse based on sustainable development: The case of Beijing Shougang Park[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(9): 2275, doi: 10.3390/buildings13092275.
[24]	余文婷, 朱鹤, 刘家明. 工业遗产游憩利用评价影响因素分析——以韩国仙游岛公园为例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(3): 588-597. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.03.2018584
	[Yu Wenting, Zhu He, Liu Jiaming. Analysis of factors affecting the evaluation of recreational use of industrial heritage: A case study of the Seonyudo Park, South Korea[J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(3): 588-597. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.03.2018584
[25]	董楠, 张春晖. 全域旅游背景下免费型森林公园游客满意度研究——以陕西王顺山国家森林公园为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(6): 109-123.
	[Dong Nan, Zhang Chunhui. Study of tourist satisfaction in a free forest park in the context of comprehensive tourism: A case of Wangshunshan in Shaanxi Province[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(6): 109-123. ]
[26]	余尤骋, 程南洋. 森林公园生态环境服务的游客感知评价研究——以江苏省7家森林公园为例[J]. 林业经济, 2020, 42(8): 39-49.
	[Yu Youcheng, Cheng Nanyang. Research on the evaluation of tourists’ perception of forest park eco-environment services: Taking seven forest parks in Jiangsu Province as examples[J]. Forestry Economics, 2020, 42(8): 39-49. ]
[27]	韩磊, 谢双玉. 武汉市滨水公共游憩空间生产的过程与机理[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(6): 183-192.
	[Han Lei, Xie Shuangyu. The process and mechanism of the production of waterfront public recreation space in Wuhan[J]. Human Geography, 2022, 37(6): 183-192. ]
[28]	赵力, 张炜, 刘楠, 等. 国家公园理念下区域生态旅游资源评价——以青海湖与祁连山毗邻区域为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44(6): 1796-1809. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.06.27
	[Zhao Li, Zhang Wei, Liu Nan, et al. Evaluation of regional ecotourism resources under the concept of national park: Taking the adjacent area between the Qinghai Lake and the Qilian Mountains as an example[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44(6): 1796-1809. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000–6060.2021.06.27
[29]	李世杰, 樊德良, 曾晓悦, 等. 存量发展背景下工业遗产价值评价体系研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2023, 53(12): 85-91, 174.
	[Li Shijie, Fan Deliang, Zeng Xiaoyue et al. Evaluation system of industrial heritage value in the context of stock development[J]. Industrial Construction, 2023, 53(12): 85-91, 174. ]
[30]	尹新, 戴伟, 段泽坤, 等. 广州市珠江啤酒厂旧址工业遗产适应性再利用研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2023, 53(12): 54-61.
	[Yin Xin, Dai Wei, Duan Zekun, et al. Research on adaptive reuse for a industrial heritage of Zhujiang brewery’s former site in Guangzhou[J]. Industrial Construction, 2023, 53(12): 54-61. ]
[31]	郭浩, 马源. 工业遗产廊道模式下的江河沿岸工业遗产保护与利用——以广州珠江为例[J]. 工业建筑, 2022, 52(5): 9-15, 76.
	[Guo Hao, Ma Yuan. Protection and utilization of riverside industrial heritage under the mode of industrial heritage corridor: Taking the Pearl River in Guangzhou as an example[J]. Industrial Construction, 2022, 52(5): 9-15, 76. ]
[32]	张岚. 层次分析法在煤矿区工业遗产价值评价体系中的应用研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2024, 43(1): 277-280.
	[Zhang Lan. Application of analytic hierarchy process in evaluation system of industrial heritage value in coal mine areas[J]. Coal Technology, 2024, 43(1): 277-280. ]
[33]	耿娜娜, 邵秀英. 基于模糊综合评价的古村落景区游客满意度研究——以皇城相府景区为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(11): 202-208.
	[Geng Nana, Shao Xiuying. Tourist satisfaction of ancient village scenic spot analyzed by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation: A case of house of the Huangcheng Chancellor scenic spot[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(11): 202-208. ]
[34]	马天. 旅游体验质量与满意度: 内涵、关系与测量[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(11): 29-40.
	[Ma Tian. Tourist experience quality and satisfaction: Connotation, relationship and measurement[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(11): 29-40. ]
[35]	谭乔西. “扎根理论”视角下的文化产业园游客感知评价研究——以北京798艺术区为例[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 46(3): 70-82.
	[Tan Qiaoxi. Evaluation of the tourists’ perception in cultural industry parks from the perspective of “Grounded Theory”: Taking Beijing 798 art district as an example[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 46(3): 70-82. ]
[36]	Wang B B, Shao C F, Li J, et al. Holiday travel behavior analysis and empirical study under integrated multimodal travel information service[J]. Transport Policy, 2015, 39: 21-36.
[37]	郭燕, 张志斌, 陈龙, 等. 居住自选择视角下城市建成环境对通勤模式选择的影响——以兰州市主城区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(2): 307-318. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2023.074
	[Guo Yan, Zhang Zhibin, Chen Long, et al. Impact of urban built environment on commuting mode choices from the residential self-selection perspective[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(2): 307-318. ] doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000－6060.2023.074
[38]	马慧强, 刘玉鑫, 燕明琪, 等. 基于SEM与IPA模型的旅游公共服务游客满意度研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(6): 192-199.
	[Ma Huiqiang, Liu Yuxin, Yan Mingqi, et al. Study on tourist satisfaction with tourism public service based on SEM and IPA models[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(6): 192-199. ]

Just accepted

Online first

Just accepted

Online first

Viewed

Full text

From	Others	local

Times	19	11
Rate	63%	37%

Abstract

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	49

From	Others	local

Times	40	9
Rate	82%	18%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

基本维度	克朗巴哈系数	KMO值	Bartlett球形检验
基本维度	克朗巴哈系数	KMO值	卡方检验	自由度	显著性水平
总量表	0.940	0.921	4166.574	276	0
空间布局规划（F1）	0.910	0.897	913.309	15	0
公共基础设施（F2）	0.912	0.857	803.854	10	0
工业旅游资源（F3）	0.816	0.797	332.906	6	0
园区景观环境（F4）	0.856	0.814	435.333	6	0
游憩活动体验（F5）	0.925	0.885	893.028	10	0